Problem - Lagrange function for mass on springs attached on a frame

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a classical mechanics problem involving a mass on a rod attached to a square frame with springs. The goal is to find the Lagrange function and the equations of motion for the mass, considering the effects of the rod's length and the springs' behavior. Participants suggest starting with Cartesian coordinates to express the system's kinetic and potential energies, while also addressing the constraints imposed by the rod. The conversation highlights the importance of determining the system's degrees of freedom and how to account for the springs' stretching. The overall objective is to identify stationary positions and stability conditions based on the spring coefficients.
asynja
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello! I have a problem in classical mechanics that I'm unable to solve. Any help would be much appreciated since we have a partial exam tomorrow. :(

Homework Statement



There's a picture of the problem in the attachment

A mass m, which is on a light rod (lenght d), is attached to a square frame with sides 2d and to two springs with coefficient k, as shown on the picture. The length of unstreched springs is d. We put the frame on the surface and spin it around the point s with angular speed ω. We assume that there is no friction between mass and the surface and that springs can slide up and down the frame (they are not fixated).
Find the Lagrange function and the equation of motion for the mass.
Where are the stationary positions? For which coefficients k is the stationary position stable when the springs are the least streched?


Homework Equations



Lagrange's formalism

The Attempt at a Solution



T=1/2mω2 , V=kx2*2 , but then I don't know how to take into the account the effect that rod with length d has on the springs (it contributes that they are stretched more, right?)
 

Attachments

  • classicalmec.JPG
    classicalmec.JPG
    4.5 KB · Views: 519
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it only acts as a constraint to keep the mass on a semi-circle.
 
The d's make me think you need to take into account GPE. The way I was taught to setup a lagrangian is to NOT start in polar, but to start in cartesian and work you're way over to polar (for the position of the mass and thus velocities). There are "mysterious" cross-terms that pop up when you do it that way. Maybe there won't be in this system, but I don't know without actually setting it up.
Also, ##V_{spring}=\frac{1}{2}k\Delta x^2## and 2 springs gives you ##k\Delta x^2##, not ##2k\Delta x^2##

paisiello is correct, since the rod wasn't given a mass, you can simply act as though it's an imaginary rod, but I'm not even sure that you need to account for it in your constraints. You just need d for you moment of inertia.
 
How many degrees of freedom does the system have? What sort of coordinates can describe those degrees of freedom conveniently? Can you express the kinetic and the potential energies of the system in those coordinates?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top