Problem on perturbation theory

sridhar
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine approximately the ground state energy of a helium like atom using first order perturbation theory in the electron-electron interaction.
Ignore the spins of the electrons and the Pauli principle.


Homework Equations


given that \intd\tau1\intd\tau2 e^-(r1+r2){}/r1+r2 = 20\Pi^{2}

The Attempt at a Solution


Consider a system where electron1-electron2 distance = r12
electron1-nucleus distance= r1
electron2-nucleus distance= r2

The S.E of this system would be exactly solvable if the term containing r12 disappears from the hamiltonian. Therefore we treat k/(r12)^{2} as the perturbation!

I applied the first order perturbation for the term k/r12
the correction would basically be <\Psi /k/(r12)^{2} / \Psi>

And i am stuck! Cant understand what to do next!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you write down the perturbing and unperturbed hamiltonia, and the eigenfunctions of the unperturbed hamiltonian?

Why are you squaring r12?

PS: When writing down an expression/equation, it is best to LaTeX the whole thing (Example: \langle \psi | (k/r_{12})| \psi \rangle), rather than parts of it. Also, for using LaTeX in line with regular text, use the tags [ itex ] [ /itex ] (without spaces) instead.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top