How Does Car Suspension Behavior Change With a Malfunctioning Shock Absorber?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sparsh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cars Suspension
AI Thread Summary
The suspension system of a car, comprising a spring and shock absorber, dampens vertical oscillations when traversing bumps. A properly functioning shock absorber results in a sinusoidal height variation that gradually stabilizes, while a malfunctioning one leads to increased amplitude of oscillation and higher vertical height above the road. When an 80kg driver enters a 920kg car, the vehicle's height decreases by 2cm due to the added weight compressing the spring. As the car travels over evenly spaced humps at a specific velocity, the amplitude of vibration increases due to the car's inertia overcoming the shock absorber's damping forces. The particular velocity can be calculated using the formula v=√2gh, where g is gravitational acceleration and h is the hump height.
sparsh
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi

The question is

In practice the suspension system of cars consists of a spring under compression combined with a shock absorber.which damps the vertical oscillations of the car . Drwa sketch graphs one in each case to illustrate how the vertical height of the car above the road will vary with time as the car just passes over a hump if the shock absorber is a) functioning properly b) improper functioning...

when a driver of mass 80kg steps into a car of mass 920 kg the vertical height of the car decreases by 2cm . If the car is driven over a series of equally spaced humps the amplitude of vibration becomes much larger for a ertain velocity.
- Explain why this occurs and calculate the particular velocity .

Please help me out with the above problems. I could not get anything related to it .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The suspension system of a car consists of a spring and a shock absorber, which is designed to damp the vertical oscillations of the car when it passes over a hump. When the shock absorber is functioning properly, the vertical height of the car above the road will vary in a sinusoidal manner with time, as the car passes over the hump, with the amplitude of the oscillation gradually decreasing until it reaches a steady state. However, when the shock absorber is not functioning correctly, the amplitude of the oscillation will increase dramatically, resulting in a much higher vertical height of the car above the road.When a driver of mass 80kg steps into a car of mass 920 kg, the vertical height of the car decreases by 2cm. This is due to the additional weight of the driver, which causes the spring to compress slightly. When the car is travelling at a certain velocity over a series of equally spaced humps, the amplitude of vibration will increase due to the increased inertia of the car. This is because the car has more momentum at this velocity and therefore is able to overcome the damping forces of the shock absorber more easily. To calculate the particular velocity at which this occurs, we can use the equation v=√2gh, where g is the acceleration due to gravity and h is the height of the hump.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top