Problem: Plastic Covering One Slit in Double Slit Experiment

AI Thread Summary
A thin plastic sheet with a refractive index of 1.45 covers one slit in a double-slit experiment, causing a dark center on the screen instead of a maximum. The phase shift required for this dark fringe is an odd multiple of one-half wavelength. The relationship N = t/λ_n - t/λ = 1/2 is derived from the phase difference between light passing through the plastic and air, where λ_n is the wavelength in the plastic. The phase shift is expressed in terms of the thickness of the plastic and the wavelengths involved. Understanding this relationship helps clarify the conditions for destructive interference in the experiment.
chipwhisperer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A very thin sheet of plastic (n = 1.45) covers one slit of a double-slit apparatus illuminated by 570 nm light. The center point on the screen, instead of being a maximum, is dark. What is the (minimum) thickness of the plastic?

Homework Equations



Constructive Interference:
d *sin(theta)=m*lamda

Destructive Interference:
d *sin(theta)=(m+1/2)*lamda

lamda_n=lamda/n

The Attempt at a Solution



So I'm a TA for a physics class and I'm a little stumped on explaining this problem. The solutions manual says that the phase shift must be an odd multiple of one half. I got that. However, it then proceeds to write down this equation:

N= t/lamda_n - t/lamda = 1/2

where t is the thickness of the plastic. Any idea how they got this relation? I would really appreciate an explanation.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
t = N lambda right.
What does N represent?

number of what??
 
N equals the phase shift I believe, i.e. 1/2, I'm not exactly sure though
 
chipwhisperer said:
So I'm a TA for a physics class and I'm a little stumped on explaining this problem. The solutions manual says that the phase shift must be an odd multiple of one half. I got that. However, it then proceeds to write down this equation:

N= t/lamda_n - t/lamda = 1/2

where t is the thickness of the plastic. Any idea how they got this relation? I would really appreciate an explanation.
Well, that expression is the phase difference between the two beams that converge at the center, expressed in terms of wavelengths. (lambda is the wavelength of light in air (or vacuum), where n = 1; lambda_n is the wavelength of light in the plastic, which is lambda/n.) The physical path lengths are the same; the only difference is that one passes through a thickness of plastic (phase shift = t/lamda_n) while the other beam passes through the same thickness of air (phase shift = t/lambda).
 
Okay, I get that. But, why is the phase shift = t/lamda? I just don't see that direct correspondence.
 
chipwhisperer said:
But, why is the phase shift = t/lamda?
If a lightwave travels from points A to B, do you not agree that the phase of the light at B differs from the phase it had at A? And that the phase shift in moving from A to B can be expressed by the number of wavelengths contained in the distance between A and B? For example, if the distance A-to-B is 1/2 lambda, when the light reaches B it is exactly 180 degrees out of phase compared to its phase when at A?

Let me know if this makes sense so far.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top