Problem question on power calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a power calculation problem involving lifting a 300 KG weight to a height of 4 meters in 1 minute and 20 seconds. The initial calculations yield a power output of 196.2 Watts when using 60 seconds instead of the correct 80 seconds for the time taken. The correct efficiency calculation, based on the actual power used of 24KW, results in an efficiency of 62 percent. The discrepancy arises from misunderstanding the time duration for the work done, which should be 80 seconds. Clarification confirms that the book's answers of 15 Watts and 62 percent efficiency are correct based on the proper time interval.
wewelsburg
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Here's the question and my answer doesn't match what the book gives as you can see in the below workings out

1)A 300 KG weight is lifted with a block and tackle to a height of 4m in 1 minute and 20 seconds A) Neglecting friction, calculate the power used? B)What’s the efficiency if the actual power used is 24KW?


My working a) Power=work/time To find work firstly force must be found
Force=300 KG X 9.81m/s= 2,943 N
Work=Force X Distance= 2,943 N X 4M=11,772 Joules
Power=11,772/60 seconds=196.2 Watts

B)Efficiency=Power out/Power in X 100
196.2/24000 X 100

Book answers= A)=15W B)=62 percent
 
Physics news on Phys.org
are you sure your data is correct? your working is correct except for the part where you should have put 80 instead of 60 seconds. plus the part about 15 W and 24 KW doesn't match...
 
yep those are the answers the book gives. Why would I divide by 80 seconds and not 60?
 
wewelsburg said:
yep those are the answers the book gives. Why would I divide by 80 seconds and not 60?

Because the work is done "in 1 minute and 20 seconds" = 60sec+20sec = 80sec.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top