Problem with making the correct FBD

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the forces acting on a wedge with a block sliding down it. The main confusion arises from understanding the normal force exerted by the block on the wedge and how it relates to the wedge's stability. It is clarified that the weight of the block does not directly act on the wedge; instead, only the contact forces, specifically the normal force, are relevant. The gravitational force on the block is considered an "action-at-a-distance" force, not affecting the wedge directly. Proper free body diagrams are emphasized as essential for visualizing and solving the problem accurately.
Better WOrld
Messages
80
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider a wedge of mass ##m## whose upper surface is a quarter circle and is smooth. The lower part is rough. A small block of same mass is kept at the topmost position and the initial position is shown in figure. The block slides down the wedge.

Find the minimum value of coefficient of friction between floor and lower surface of wedge so that the wedge remains stationery during the block's motion on it.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I managed to calculate the normal force ##N## exerted by the wedge on the block. This comes out to be ##3mg\sin\theta##. This is also the force exerted by the block on the wedge. However, when I tried to find the normal reaction of the ground on the wedge, Iran into problems.

According to me, we should include the weight of the wedge (##W_W##)+ the vertical component of ##N## + the weight of the block (##W_B## and equate all of them with ##N'## (the normal force acting on the wedge). In other words, $$N'=W_W +N\sin\theta+W_B$$

However, the solution given equates the normal reaction on the wedge by $$N'=W_W+N\sin\theta$$

Could somebody please explain why we ignore the force exerted on the wedge by the block while calculating the normal reaction ##N'## on the wedge? Is it because the weight of the block is a component of the normal force ##N##? If so, how do we know this?

I would be really, really grateful if somebody could kindly explain this in detail to me. Many thanks in anticipation.
 

Attachments

  • 7222d7ff3024fe60caeaa627c563368dc0add114.png
    7222d7ff3024fe60caeaa627c563368dc0add114.png
    7.6 KB · Views: 358
Physics news on Phys.org
The weight of the block, ##W_B##, is the gravitational force acting on the block. It is not a force acting on the wedge. It is a mysterious "action-at-a-distance" force exerted by the Earth on the block.

The only force that the block exerts on the wedge is the contact force, ##N##. (The gravitational attraction between the wedge and block is of course negligible.)

The value of ##N## does depend on the weight of the block as you found when you determined ##N = 3mg\sin \theta##.
 
TSny said:
The weight of the block, ##W_B##, is the gravitational force acting on the block. It is not a force acting on the wedge. It is a mysterious "action-at-a-distance" force exerted by the Earth on the block.

The only force that the block exerts on the wedge is the contact force, ##N##. (The gravitational attraction between the wedge and block is of course negligible.)

The value of ##N## does depend on the weight of the block as you found when you determined ##N = 3mg\sin \theta##.

Thanks for your response.
But then when we have a block at rest on a rough inclined plane, why s the normal reaction on the wedge by the Earth equal to ##W_B+W_W##?
 
Better WOrld said:
Thanks for your response.
But then when we have a block at rest on a rough inclined plane, why s the normal reaction on the wedge by the Earth equal to ##W_B+W_W##?
To see why, you'll need a good free body diagram of the block as well as the wedge. Can you describe what each diagram looks like?
 
TSny said:
To see why, you'll need a good free body diagram of the block as well as the wedge. Can you describe what each diagram looks like?
Well, there would be 2 forces acting on the block: one perpendicular to the plane of the block - the normal force, and one up the surface of the inclined plane to counterbalance friction.

However, I cannot think of the FBD of the wedge. I know that the direction of the frictional force on the block and the normal force on the block will be reversed respectively. I don't know whether to include gravitational force on the block exerted on the wedge or not. Nor can I understand whether or not to include it.
 
Better WOrld said:
Well, there would be 2 forces acting on the block: one perpendicular to the plane of the block - the normal force, and one up the surface of the inclined plane to counterbalance friction.
You have left out a force on the block. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "to counterbalance friction". The force on the block that acts parallel to the incline is the friction force that the wedge exerts on the block. This friction force prevents the block from sliding down the incline.

However, I cannot think of the FBD of the wedge. I know that the direction of the frictional force on the block and the normal force on the block will be reversed respectively.
OK, they will be reversed (3rd law). There are two other forces that act on the wedge (but neither of these two other forces is ##W_B##.)
I don't know whether to include gravitational force on the block exerted on the wedge or not. Nor can I understand whether or not to include it.
There is no such thing as "a gravitational force on the block exerted on the wedge". The gravitational force ##W_B## that acts on the block is not a force that acts on the wedge. The only forces that the block exerts on the wedge are the normal force and the friction force. ##W_B## does not act on the wedge, it acts on the block.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top