Problems about eigenvector in quantum mechanics

wowowo2006
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I am learning about the basic quantum mechanics
I know that an operator ,call it M^, is generally a matrix
And we also can be represent it b a matrix representation M, associated with certain basis |e>

M^ = sigma ( Mij |e> <e|)
I,j
Where Mij is matrix element of M

So now I wonder which matrix should I use, M^ or M
To find the eigenvector?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An operator \hat M is an object that takes a vector and gives another vector. It is not a matrix but it has a matrix representation which depends on the base set used. If the base set is \{|n\rangle\}_{n=0}^{\infty}, the matrix elements of \hat M in this basis are M_{mn}=\langle m | \hat M | n \rangle. This is the only matrix associated to \hat M(up to change of basis, of course).
 
Shyan said:
An operator \hat M is an object that takes a vector and gives another vector. It is not a matrix but it has a matrix representation which depends on the base set used. If the base set is \{|n\rangle\}_{n=0}^{\infty}, the matrix elements of \hat M in this basis are M_{mn}=\langle m | \hat M | n \rangle. This is the only matrix associated to \hat M(up to change of basis, of course).
So that means,
When I change the basis, the matrix representation change
So do the eigenvector changes too?
 
wowowo2006 said:
So that means,
When I change the basis, the matrix representation change
So do the eigenvector changes too?

I see what's your problem.
You should be able to distinguish between abstract mathematical constructs and their representations. The operators and vectors are entities independent of their representations. They don't change when you change basis, its just that their components w.r.t. different bases are different. Its like vectors in Euclidean space. They are the same no matter you use a particular set i,j,k or another set rotated w.r.t. to the first one. The vector is the same, only the component changes to comply with the change of basis.
So no, eigenvectors do not change, they only have different components w.r.t. to different bases.
 
Let's clarify this issue a bit. You have a linear operator on Hilbert space (usually defined on a dense subset). This we denote with \hat{A}. Then you can choose any representation you like by taking a complete orthonormal set |u_{j} \rangle of vectors, fulfilling
\langle u_j | u_k \rangle=\delta_{jk}, \quad \sum_{j} |u_j \rangle \langle u_j|=\hat{1}.
Now you can represent the operator in terms of its matrix elements with respect to this basis,
A_{jk}=\langle u_j |\hat{A} u_k \rangle.
You get back the operator by inserting two identity operators in terms of the completeness relation for the basis,
\hat{A}=\sum_{j,k} |u_j \rangle \langle j|\hat{M} u_k \rangle \langle u_k |=\sum_{jk} M_{jk} |u_j \rangle \langle u_k|.
I hope, now at least the formalities are a bit more clear.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top