Production of massive neutrinos in electron - positron annihilation.

Maz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I bumbed in such event in on book written in middle 80's.

Does anyone know anything of such phenomena? Has that theory been killed or is there any info available of it anywhere??

Oh joy... I'm writing an essay of neutrinos, and I am really lost.. :|

Oh, and another question... Any other theories around, that try to expand SM, but supersymmetry and superstrings??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A russian team though there had found a neutrino about 17 eV mass. Not idea what kind of experiment it was.
 
Maz said:
Oh, and another question... Any other theories around, that try to expand SM, but supersymmetry and superstrings??
The first ones that come to mind are Grand Unified Theories. Essentially they try embedding the standard model gauge group, U(1) X SU(2) X SU(3), into a simpler gauge group like SU(5). A good introduction can be found at
http://www.geocities.com/jefferywinkler/beyondstandardmodel.html
 
Last edited:
Current theory and experiments indicate electron-positron annihilation results in the production of two 511 kev gamma rays and nothing else.
 
mathman said:
Current theory and experiments indicate electron-positron annihilation results in the production of two 511 kev gamma rays and nothing else.


yep, yep

this is also a nice illustration of how restmass can be converted to relativistic mass and the other way around. Two fotons colliding (scattering) can form a positron-electron pair which have restmasses...
 
Doesn't a neutrino acquire mass through the Higgs conform the Standard Model
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top