Production of Z boson - Cross Section

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Calculate the ratio ##R = \frac{\sigma_{had}}{\sigma_{\mu+\mu-}}## for energy around ##10~GeV##.
At sufficiently high energies, the ##e^+e^- \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^-## reaction can proceed via the ##Z^0## boson. Assuming vertex factors for EM and weak interaction are the same, at what beam energy (below ##M_Z##) would the contribution to cross section from ##\gamma## be the same as the contribution from the ##Z^0## exchange?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Since at around ##10~GeV##, production of u,d,s,c quarks are possible, ##R = 3 \times \left[ (\frac{1}{3})^2 + (\frac{2}{3})^2 + (\frac{1}{3})^2 + (\frac{2}{3})^2 + (\frac{1}{3})^2 \right] = \frac{11}{3}##.

Since we can assume the vertex factor for EM and weak interaction to be the same, thus the cross-section for (##e+e \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^- ##) is the same for weak and EM. We have just calculated ##R = \frac{11}{3}##.

Since cross-section grows as ##\sigma \sim E_{cm}^2##, total contribution from EM processes is ##\left(1 + \frac{11}{3}\right) E^2##. Contribution from ##Z^0## process is simply ##M_w^2##.

Does this mean that ##E = \sqrt{\frac{3}{14}}m_w = 0.46m_W##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top