Projectile Motion angled downwards

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a high school AP Physics homework problem involving projectile motion at a downward angle. The user is tasked with calculating various parameters, including time to hit the ground and horizontal distance, given a gun's muzzle velocity and angle. Initial vertical velocity calculations were initially incorrect, with clarification needed on the sign convention for downward motion. The conversation highlights that despite the downward trajectory, the bullet's path remains parabolic, with only part of the curve being visible due to the starting conditions. Overall, the user seeks to understand the principles of projectile motion in this specific scenario.
NYmike
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello all. I am currently taking an AP Physics class in high school. My teacher has given us a homework assignment involving projectile motion, however, it is different than anything else we have done. Usually, the angle is upward, or directly horizontal...This question is downward. My textbook does not offer any examples, so I am unsure of where to go for help.

A gun is pointed down at an angle 40 degress below the horizontal. The muzzle velocity is 350 m/s and the bullets mass is 30 g. The gun is 600 m above the ground. Calculate how long it takes to hit the ground, the horizontal distance traveled, the vertical velocity as it hits the ground, ...

The mass is useless, but it's given. There is a list of 10 or so questions, but I just need help getting started. I don't want 1 error to snowball.

In a normal parabola, the final vertical velocity is the negative value of the inital vertical velocity. However...this wouldn't be a normal parabola, right? Because it's just getting shot diagonally in a downward motion.

VERTICAL:

vi = 224.98 m/s
vf = -224.98 m/s
t =
d = -600 m
a = -9.8 m/s^2 (neglect air resistance)

HORIZONTAL:

vi = 268.11 m/s
vf = 268.11 m/s
t =
d =
a = 0 m/s^2


Would that be correct for the givens? I took sin and cos of 40. I am just not sure if the final vertical velocity is correct, because I don't think it would be a parabola.

Sorry for writing so much, and thank you for any help that you can provide =D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your horizontal information is correct (I did not check your arithmetic).But you vertical information is not. The initial velocity should be negative, you need to compute the final velocity with the information given.
 
Integral said:
Your horizontal information is correct (I did not check your arithmetic).But you vertical information is not. The initial velocity should be negative, you need to compute the final velocity with the information given.

pssh...I was thikning way too into it...thanks for your help.

I used the formula vf^2 = vi^2 + 2ad

Mathematically the answer turns out to be a positive number...Since it is still in the downward direction however, i should make it negative, correct?

EDIT: And thanks for moving the thread. Sry




What is the mathematical term for the path that the bullet takes? Projectile motion is always parabolic, however I am not able to see how that can be so with this problem...
 
Last edited:
If you were to graph it (distance vs time), youd see why it is parabolic. If the bullet was shot at 0 degrees (horizontally), youd see half the parabola. You would see half the parabolic curve because at this point the vertical velocity was 0 (which is also true when a projectile reaches the maximum height in its flight). In that case, its as if you are only seeing half the projectiles motion. A similar situation occurs in this example. However, the projectile does not start at the maximum height, it begins on its way back downwards. Thats why you would only see a certain portion of the parabola. In each situation, the projectile follows a parabolic curve. However, in the last 2 situations, it only doesn't do so for the entire curve. Does that make any sense?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top