Projectile motion - ball in circular motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a ball in circular motion on a table that snaps, causing the ball to move in the x-direction under the influence of gravity. The challenge is to determine how long it takes for the ball to fall off the table when the table is tilted to maintain contact without exerting force. Participants explore the implications of the ball's projectile motion and the geometry of the situation, noting that maintaining contact while the ball follows a parabolic trajectory may be impossible. The conversation highlights the complexities of the problem, including the need to consider the angle of the table and the relationship between the ball's motion and the table's surface. Ultimately, the problem remains difficult to solve, but insights into the dynamics of the situation are shared.
finitefemmet
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Okey, so the problem started with a ball in circular motion on a table (xy-plane, seen from above). Eventually the rope that held the ball snapped and the ball continued on (no friction/air resistance) with constant velocity in x-direction. Gravity working in negative z-direction, just too clarify.

Mass: 0.01kg
Starting velocity x-dir. : 0.5m/s (constant, from when the rope snapped)
Starting velocity z-dir : 0
Distance from were the ball snapped too the edge: 0.5m

Suppose you now turn the table in such a way that there always is ("barely") contact
between the ball and the table, but there is no force between them.

So my problem:

How long does it take before the ball falls off the table?

The situation starts when the rope snapped (time=0)



The Attempt at a Solution



Well I have been really stuck on this. I have been trying to express the angle of the table, function of gravity. Also tried using pytagoras too express z-x in the motion equations. Since I know that the hypotenuse is 0.5m. Tried and failed a lot really.

If anyone have any suggestions or how I can express this, that would be appreciated.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
finitefemmet said:

Homework Statement



Okey, so the problem started with a ball in circular motion on a table (xy-plane, seen from above). Eventually the rope that held the ball snapped and the ball continued on (no friction/air resistance) with constant velocity in x-direction. Gravity working in negative z-direction, just too clarify.

Mass: 0.01kg
Starting velocity x-dir. : 0.5m/s (constant, from when the rope snapped)
Starting velocity z-dir : 0
Distance from were the ball snapped too the edge: 0.5m

Suppose you now turn the table in such a way that there always is ("barely") contact
between the ball and the table, but there is no force between them.

So my problem:

How long does it take before the ball falls off the table?

The situation starts when the rope snapped (time=0)



The Attempt at a Solution



Well I have been really stuck on this. I have been trying to express the angle of the table, function of gravity. Also tried using pytagoras too express z-x in the motion equations. Since I know that the hypotenuse is 0.5m. Tried and failed a lot really.

If anyone have any suggestions or how I can express this, that would be appreciated.

Thank you

Suppose that at the point the string broke, the table magically disappeared. The ball would then travel as a projectile - following a parabolic path. That seems to indicate that unless the table surface is parabolic - there cannot be "such a way that there always is ("barely") contact between the ball and the table"

That is unless the table surface is vertical - in which case you need more than a string to have the ball traveling in a (now) vertical circle at constant speed.

The situation may be impossible - both to occur and also to analyse.
 
Yes well I have been trying too solve this without thinking about the table. But I was thinking of something, since I know that the hypotenuse is 0.5m. If you imagine a right-angled triangle, one side that illustrates the difference in height and the other traveled in x-direction.

But still I find this very hard to solve.
 
Hmm. If the table is (actively) tilted in such a fashion as to always be barely in contact with the projectile without exerting force on it, what might one say about the plane of the surface of the table with respect to the velocity vector of the projectile?
 
I have solved it;)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top