hancyu
- 57
- 0
i don't get it... so, should i substitute sinO with (1-cosO^2)^1/2 ?
The forum discussion centers on solving projectile motion problems, specifically calculating maximum angles of projection and heights. Key problems include determining the angle of projection for a projectile to ensure its position vector is always increasing and finding the angle of inclination for a mass on an inclined plane with friction. The participants utilize equations of motion, such as \(y(t) = v_{0y}t + \frac{1}{2}gt^2\), and discuss the implications of forces acting on the masses involved. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying physics principles and equations to arrive at accurate solutions.
PREREQUISITESStudents studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in mastering projectile motion problems and their applications in real-world scenarios.
hancyu said:so 1st i divided the whole equation with -5
i got.
1=2sinO -cosO then, i substituted sqrt(1-sin(O)^2) to cosO
then i got. 1=4sin^2(O) + 1 - sin^2(O) which doesn't make sense.
how should i do it?
hancyu said:**EDIT**
so... 22/19.15 = t = 1.15s
y=Vyot +1/2gt^2
y=12.0m
vyf^2 - vyo^2 = 2gy
vyf=4.8m/s
is this right?
Dick said:If you throw a ball upwards at a steep angle it will go away from you and then come back towards you (and hit you on the head if the angle is too steep). If you throw it out at a shallow angle then it always travels away from you and doesn't come back. They want you to find the angle that divides the two cases.
Dick said:No, it's not 45 degrees. If the launch angle is theta then you work out x(t) and y(t). The distance squared from the launch point (0,0) is r(t)^2=x(t)^2+y(t)^2. You want to take the derivative of r(t)^2 with respect to t and then figure out for which angles theta that expression has a zero derivative. These are the ones where it comes back towards you.
lorenzom21 said:Dick, why is it that I have to find the derivative of r(t)^2? the distance is r(t) so shouldn't I derive r(t) with respect to t and not r(t)^2?