Proof - Express in Clyndrical Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter forestmine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on expressing the differential element ds² in cylindrical coordinates, demonstrating that ds² = dr² + r²dθ² + dz². The transformation utilizes the equations x = rcos(θ), y = rsin(θ), and z = z to derive the relationship. A common point of confusion involves the notation and the interpretation of differentials, particularly how dx² translates into the cylindrical form. Clarification on interpreting dx² as (dx)² resolves key misunderstandings in the proof process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cylindrical coordinates in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with differential notation and calculus
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and their applications
  • Basic grasp of vector calculus concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Jacobian for cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn about the applications of cylindrical coordinates in physics
  • Explore the concept of differential forms in calculus
  • Investigate the relationship between Cartesian and polar coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, particularly those studying multivariable calculus, as well as educators and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of coordinate transformations in mathematical proofs.

forestmine
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Proof -- Express in Clyndrical Coordinates

Homework Statement



Show that when you express ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 +dz^2 in cylindrical coordinates, you get ds^2 = dr^2 + r^2d^2 + dz^2.

Homework Equations



x=rcosθ
y=rsinθ
z=z

The Attempt at a Solution



EDIT// I was really over thinking this...think I've got it figured out. Thanks anyways!

I'm somewhat confused about the notation here and how to really go about this. My first thought was just to plug in some values...

ds^2 = d(r^2*cos^2(θ)) + d(r^2*sin^2(θ)) + dz^2

The d(__) are really throwing me off here. I don't see how the second term in the right hand side of the proof goes to r^2d^2.

Ah really lost here. Just need some help in the right direction.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


You should interpret [itex]dx^2[/itex] as meaning [itex](dx)^2[/itex].
 


I think that was my hang up exactly. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K