Proof involving the sum of squared integers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theorem stating that numbers in the set {99, 999, 9999, ...} cannot be expressed as the sum of two squared integers, while at least one can be represented as the sum of three squared integers. An example provided is 32 + 32 + 92 = 99, illustrating the latter case. The conversation emphasizes the use of Euclid's division algorithm and modular arithmetic to demonstrate these properties. Participants suggest using remainders to test the validity of the theorem through modular conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with Euclid's division algorithm
  • Knowledge of integer representations as sums of squares
  • Basic logic and proof techniques in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of numbers represented as sums of squares
  • Study Euclid's division algorithm in depth
  • Learn about modular arithmetic applications in number theory
  • Explore the three-square theorem and its implications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of integers and their representations as sums of squares.

Entropee
Gold Member
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Theorem: the numbers in the set {99, 999, 9999, ... } cannot be written as two squared integers, but at least one can be expressed as the sum of 3 squared integers.


Homework Equations



Well there are a lot of examples but let's go with 32 + 32 + 92 = 99

We may have to use Euclid's division algorithm as well.


The Attempt at a Solution



If we call the first part P and the second part Q then we can assume \negP \vee \negQ, and try to show a contradiction here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Entropee said:
If we call the first part P and the second part Q then we can assume \negP \vee \negQ, and try to show a contradiction here.
What is P, what is Q?

I would consider remainders here.
 
Sorry I'm on an ipad and was being lazy haha. Let p stand for "the numbers in that set cannot be written as two squared integers" and Q stand for "at least one number in the set can be represented as three integers squared." How should remainders be used here?
 
Just show both of them separately, there is no need to start with logical statements. You found an example how at least one of those numbers can be written as sum of three squares. Fine, this part is done. Now you have to show that none of those numbers is the sum of two squares.

How should remainders be used here?
As always. Test if an equality can hold mod some number - if not, it cannot be true at all.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
4K