Proof -- motion under a central force in text Symon Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the relationship between kinetic energy (T), potential energy (V), and total energy (E) for a particle moving under a central force in a 3-dimensional space, specifically within the xy-plane using polar coordinates. Participants emphasize the importance of integrating the equations of motion to demonstrate conservation of angular momentum and energy. A referenced resource, a chapter from a physics textbook, is suggested for further clarification on the topic. The integration process is crucial for establishing the connection between the forces acting on the particle and the energy conservation principles. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving problems related to motion under central forces.
kylinsky
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. The derivation
In a 3-dim space,a particle is acted by a central force(the center of the force fixed in the origin) .we now take the motion entirely in the xy-plane and write the equations of the motion in polar coordinate
upload_2016-8-20_1-11-5.png

how can i derive from these equation that
T(kinetic energy)+V(potential)=E=
upload_2016-8-20_1-13-44.png
?
(sorry for my poor english)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-8-20_1-8-23.png
    upload_2016-8-20_1-8-23.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 489
  • upload_2016-8-20_1-10-46.png
    upload_2016-8-20_1-10-46.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
kylinsky said:
1. The derivation
In a 3-dim space,a particle is acted by a central force(the center of the force fixed in the origin) .we now take the motion entirely in the xy-plane and write the equations of the motion in polar coordinate
View attachment 104870

how can i derive from these equation that
T(kinetic energy)+V(potential)=E=View attachment 104871?
(sorry for my poor english)

Read http://leandros.physics.uoi.gr/cm1/book-cm/ch6.pdf, for example.
You need to integrate both equations. The integral of the second one is conservation of angular momentum, that of the first one is conservation of energy.
 
ehild said:
Read http://leandros.physics.uoi.gr/cm1/book-cm/ch6.pdf, for example.
You need to integrate both equations. The integral of the second one is conservation of angular momentum, that of the first one is conservation of energy.
thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top