Proportion Problem Dealing with Moon's Period

  • Thread starter Thread starter PeachBanana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Period
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the new orbital period of the moon if its distance from the Earth is increased to four times its current distance. The context is rooted in gravitational physics and the relationship between orbital period and distance, specifically using the proportionality of the period to the distance raised to the power of 3/2.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the proportional relationship between the orbital period and distance, with some attempting to apply the formula T ∝ r^(3/2). There are varying methods suggested, including introducing a constant of proportionality and setting up ratios to solve for the new period.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on setting up equations and ratios, while others express confusion about the steps involved in the calculations. There is a recognition of multiple approaches being explored, but no explicit consensus on a single method has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the original period of the moon as approximately four weeks and question the implications of changing the distance on the period. There is also a side discussion regarding posting limits within the forum.

PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



18. If the moon were four times the distance from the Earth than it currently is, the amount of time it would take to go around the Earth would be roughly (the current orbital period of the moon is about four weeks)

A. 8 weeks
B. 11 Weeks
C. 16 Weeks
D. 32 Weeks
E. 64 Weeks

Homework Equations



T is directly proportional to (r)^3/2

The Attempt at a Solution



I absolutely am awful at problems that deal strictly with proportions.

T = (4)^(3/2)
(4)^(3/2) = 8 weeks

Since the coefficient in front of "T" is "one," should I multiply four by eight since the problem states the period of the moon is about four weeks long?

Also, is there a maximum number of times a person can post in one day? I feel like I post a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea about a maximum number of votes, but who cares anyway!

Proportions are okay if you think about them in a good way (as with most things). Personally I like to introduce a constant so the statement "T is directly proportional to (r)^3/2" I would write as
T \propto r^{3/2}
then
T = C r^{3/2}

then you also have an equation for when the distance changes, using primes

T' = C r'^{3/2}

Now you are left with two coupled equations (see that C remains the same!) and a relation

r'=4r

By solving for T' you will see some cancellation which will you an answer.

I think doing it the method you have tried is possible. I get 32 if that helps.
 
You might find it easier to set up your ratios as an equation. If T is proportional to r3/2, then ignoring constants of proportionality write:

##T^2 \propto r^3##

Then if you have initial and final values (one or more of which may be unknowns), then you might write:

## T1^2 \propto r1^3 ##
## T2^2 \propto r2^3 ##

Dividing one relation by the other:

## \frac{T1^2}{T2^2} = \frac{r1^3}{r2^3}##

Substitute in the things you know and solve for what you want.
 
gash789 said:
I have no idea about a maximum number of votes, but who cares anyway!

Proportions are okay if you think about them in a good way (as with most things). Personally I like to introduce a constant so the statement "T is directly proportional to (r)^3/2" I would write as
T \propto r^{3/2}
then
T = C r^{3/2}

then you also have an equation for when the distance changes, using primes

T' = C r'^{3/2}

Now you are left with two coupled equations (see that C remains the same!) and a relation

r'=4r

By solving for T' you will see some cancellation which will you an answer.

I think doing it the method you have tried is possible. I get 32 if that helps.

Do you mind explicitly explaining how you went from T' = C r'^{3/2}

to r'=4r ? I also got 32, which is the correct answer, but I'm still just a tad bit confused.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K