Understanding Proportional Components in Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics-chris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proportionality
AI Thread Summary
To determine if one component is proportional to another in equations, it is essential to analyze the relationships involved. For example, in the equation s = ut + 1/2 at^2, s is only proportional to t when acceleration (a) is zero, as u remains constant. In contrast, the area A = πr^2 shows that A is proportional to r^2, since π is a constant. Additionally, in the equation v = u + at, if acceleration is zero, final velocity v is proportional to time t; otherwise, it is not. Understanding these conditions highlights that proportional relationships can vary based on specific circumstances within equations.
physics-chris
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Looking at a set of equations -how exactly do you work out if one component is proportional to another.


Homework Equations


In the example given s = ut + 1/2 at^2, I am told that s is not proporional to t unless acceleration is zero, because u is a constant.



The Attempt at a Solution


On one of my simpler questions, A=pi r^2, I am assumning that because pi is a constant A must be proportional to r^2 as that is what controlshow big or small A is.

On a second question v = u + at, I thought, as in the example that if acceleration is zero, that the final velocity must be proportional to time because u, the initial velocity, is a constant. But if acceleration is not zero then v is not proportional to t.

If that is correct, are there always (in most equations) some sort circumstances where the components that would be proportional in one circumstance, are not in another?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physics-chris said:
In the example given s = ut + 1/2 at^2, I am told that s is not proporional to t unless acceleration is zero, because u is a constant.
For variable Y to be proportional to variable X just means that if X is increased by some factor, then Y is increased by the same factor. That's only true if the relationship between Y and X can be written like: Y = constant*X.

In this example, s = ut would be an example of proportionality, but s = ut + 1/2 at^2 would not.

The Attempt at a Solution


On one of my simpler questions, A=pi r^2, I am assumning that because pi is a constant A must be proportional to r^2 as that is what controlshow big or small A is.
Right. Here A is proportional to r^2, since A = constant*r^2. (Note that A is proportional to r^2, but not to r.)
 
Thanks- think I've sorted it now
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top