Proton passes parallel conducting plates

AI Thread Summary
A proton passing between two parallel conducting plates curves upwards due to the electric force acting on it. An alpha particle, entering with the same velocity, has a less curved path because it has double the charge but approximately four times the mass of the proton. This results in a greater force on the alpha particle, but its increased mass leads to reduced acceleration, causing it to deflect less. The discussion highlights that greater acceleration results in tighter turns, analogous to a car turning more sharply with increased speed. Thus, the proton's tighter curve is attributed to its higher acceleration compared to the alpha particle.
Masafi
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
A proton is shown to pass between two parallel conducting plates across which a steady potential difference is maintained. Its path curves upwards.

An alpha particle enters at the same point with the same velocity as the proton. Add its path to the diagram. Why is it like this.

The path is less curved, and the answer given is:

Charge on alpha is double that on proton, so force is double using F=Eq

Mass of a particle is (approx) 4 times more hence acceleration is approximately halved

Why is the second point added? What has the acceleration got to do with the change in path? Is it that particles that deflect more have a greater acceleraton because their direction is changed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Masafi! :smile:
Masafi said:
What has the acceleration got to do with the change in path? Is it that particles that deflect more have a greater acceleraton because their direction is changed?

Yes, it's like turning a car … the more acceleration, the tighter the circle.

So the proton accelerates more than the alpha particle, and it turns tighter (more curved). :wink:

(acceleration is change in velocity, and that of course includes change in direction, even if there's no change in speed :smile:)​
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top