Proton travelling through a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
A proton traveling at 6,000,000 m/s in a 0.5 Tesla magnetic field experiences a force of 4.8065e-13 Newtons, resulting in a circular motion with a radius of 0.125 meters. The period for one complete revolution is calculated to be approximately 131 nanoseconds. To find the instantaneous position after 1 nanosecond, the angular position is determined using alpha = 2pi*(t/T), yielding an alpha of 0.0478 radians. The Cartesian coordinates are then calculated using X = Cos(alpha)*Radius and Y = Sin(alpha)*Radius, leading to accurate position values. The calculations confirm the proton's trajectory in the magnetic field, demonstrating the relationship between velocity, radius, and angular position.
JonathanH13
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am having trouble with a basic deflection problem - a single proton traveling through a magnetic field:

v = Velocity of the proton = 6 000 000 meters per second (1/50th the speed of light, so no relativistic effects)

B = magnetic field strength = 0.5 Tesla

Charge of proton q = + 1.60217e-19 Coulombs

Mass of proton m = 1.67262e-27 kg

Direction = zero radians


Homework Equations



Force = q*v*B sin(theta)

Radius=(Mass*sqr(Velocity))/Force

Period:=(2*pi*Radius)/Velocity

Force=Mass*Acceleration


The Attempt at a Solution



First I find the maximum force on the proton due to its charge and velocity through the field:

Force = q*v*B sin(theta)

In this case the proton is traveling perpendicular to the field, so sin(theta) = 1

and the magnitude of the force is simply:

Force = q*v*B

= 4.8065e-13 Newtons

Now that is fine, and if I want the radius of the circle described by the proton in the field I can use:

Radius=(Mass*sqr(Velocity))/Force or r=mv/qB

= 0.125 meters or 125mm

Which is particularly satisfying, because it relates such high speed, low mass and charge into a realistic spatial dimension.

I can also find the time that it takes to complete one revolution:

Period:=(2*pi*Radius)/Velocity

=131.19e-9 seconds or 131 nanoseconds.


But what I would like to find is the instantaneous position and direction after a given time, say 1 nanosecond.

I tried dividing the circumference by 131 nanoseconds, but I feel like this is cheating. :frown:

I also tried to use

Acceleration = Force/mass, but in this case the acceleration is only a change in direction, not in velocity. :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JonathanH13 said:
But what I would like to find is the instantaneous position and direction after a given time, say 1 nanosecond.

I tried dividing the circumference by 131 nanoseconds, but I feel like this is cheating. :frown:

I also tried to use

Acceleration = Force/mass, but in this case the acceleration is only a change in direction, not in velocity. :confused:

It is no cheating if you calculate the angular position as
alpha = 2pi*(t/T). And you know that the proton moves along a circle with constant speed, so the velocity vector is tangent to the circle. Knowing alpha, you also get the direction of the velocity.

ehild
 
Thanks for your reply. You describe angular position, but I require cartesian coordinates in order to simulate this:

I calculate alpha = 2pi*(t/T), using t = 1e-9 (1 nanosecond), and T (Period of one revolution) = 131.19e-9 seconds

This gives me an alpha of 0.0478 (is that in Radians?)

To attempt to convert that into an instantaneous position (my original problem),

I use Y = Sin(alpha)*Radius and X = Cos(alpha)*Radius

So, in in one nanosecond the proton is now at:

X = 0.1258 meters
Y = 0.00599 meters

Is that correct?
 
it is correct, but I got x=0.1248 m.

ehild
 
Ah, I think I see the error with my calculation.

I am now using X = Cos(alpha)*(Velocity*1e-9)

That is, if velocity is distance per second, and I require distance per nanosecond, hence(Velocity*1e-9). This delivers x and y values that describe a circle with the correct radius!

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top