Prove a lens must always be converging if

  • Thread starter Thread starter jones268
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Converging Lens
AI Thread Summary
A lens must be converging to produce an upright, enlarged image, as concave lenses only create virtual, reduced images. The discussion emphasizes the need for mathematical proof, suggesting that ray diagrams can visually demonstrate this principle. Converging lenses, such as convex lenses, are the only type capable of enlarging images while maintaining an upright orientation. Understanding the properties of lens types is crucial for solving this problem. Therefore, a converging lens is essential for achieving the desired image characteristics.
jones268
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Prove a lens must always be converging if...

Consider a single lens with the object on the left side. Prove that for an upright, enlarged image that the lens must always be converging. I'm assuming my professor wants this to be mathematically proven, but I have no idea how to do so...HELP! I don't even know where to begin with this question
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well, conceptually, a concave lens will ALWAYS produce an image that is virtual and reduced in size. So, if you want an enlarged image, your lens NEEDS to be converging - there are no other options.

You could prove this by drawing lens ray diagrams. If you haven't learned how to draw those, they're pretty simple! Here's something that might be helpful :
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/refrn/u14l5da.cfm
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Similar threads

Analyzing this 2-lens optical system
Replies
5
Views
1K
Lens Maker's Formula - Confusion in the derivation
Replies
15
Views
1K
Understanding a Converging Lens and Its Two Positions
Replies
3
Views
2K
Combination of thin lens and concave mirror
Replies
2
Views
2K
Converging Lens and Plane Mirror Question
Replies
1
Views
3K
Multiple Lens System(Objectless and Parallel Rays)
Replies
2
Views
2K
Two lenses: find Di through second lens
Replies
3
Views
2K
How Does a Combined Lens and Mirror System Create Images?
Replies
1
Views
4K
Are Real Images Always Inverted and Virtual Always Erect in Ray Optics?
Replies
9
Views
8K
Convergent lenses and calculating image position
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top