Prove Diagonals of Parallelograms Bisect w/ Vector Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter kanki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other using vector methods. Participants explore various vector representations for points A, B, C, and D in parallelogram ABCD, focusing on the intersection point O of the diagonals AC and BD. They derive relationships between the vectors, concluding that the sum of vectors OA and OC equals zero, indicating that O is the midpoint of AC. Further analysis leads to the conclusion that O must also be the midpoint of DB, reinforcing the bisection property of the diagonals. The conversation highlights the complexity of the proof and invites suggestions for more concise methods.
kanki
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm stucked here...
How to prove that the diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other using vector method?
Let's say for ABCD which is parallelogram, AB//DC, AD//BC, O is the point of intersection of the diagonals.
Can i straight away apply that \overrightarrow{AO}=\frac{1}{2}\overrightarrow{AB}+\frac{1}{2}\overrightarrow{BC}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Say you have a parallelogram ABCD, AB // CD, and AD // BC. O is the intersection of AC and BD.
You have:
\vec{OA} = \vec{OB} + \vec{BA} = \vec{OD} + \vec{DA}
\vec{OC} = \vec{OB} + \vec{BC} = \vec{OD} + \vec{DC}
\vec{OA} + \vec{OC} = 2\vec{OB} + \vec{BA} + \vec{BC}
= 2\vec{OB} + \vec{BD}
\vec{OA} + \vec{OC} will give you a vector which is on AC.
2\vec{OB} + \vec{BD} will give you a vector which is on BD.
The only vector that's both on AC and BD is \vec{0}.
So \vec{OA} + \vec{OC} = \vec{0} \Leftrightarrow O is the midpoint of AC.
From there, you can easily prove O is the midpoint of DB.
Hope someone will come up with another shorter proof.
To use: \vec{AO} = \frac{1}{2}(\vec{AB} + \vec{BC}), just state that O is the midpoint of AC, and \vec{AC} = \vec{AB} + \vec{BC} \Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{2} \vec{AC} = \frac{1}{2} (\vec{AB} + \vec{BC}) \Leftrightarrow \vec{AO} = \frac{1}{2}(\vec{AB} + \vec{BC})
Viet Dao,
 
Last edited:
Probably, a little shorter than VietDao has, but similar.
\vec{AO}+\vec{OB}=\vec{AB}
\vec{AO}+\vec{OD}=\vec{AD}
2\vec{AO}+\vec{OB}+\vec{OD}=\vec{AC}
\vec{OB}+\vec{OD}=\vec{AC}-2\vec{AO}
Thus \vec{OB}+\vec{OD}=\vec{0} (for the reason, which explaned VietDao)
For me it also doesn't looks as simpliest way.
 
But, aren't we have to assume that magnitude of OB and OD is not the same? And so AO is not half of AC.
So how to prove that OB + OD = AC - 2AO = 0?
 
OB and OD are on the same line (they are parallel) (i believe it's given in definition of diagonal).
 
kanki said:
But, aren't we have to assume that magnitude of OB and OD is not the same? And so AO is not half of AC.
So how to prove that OB + OD = AC - 2AO = 0?
Assume only that the two segments of each diagonal are parallel, not equal

\vec{AC} = \vec{AB} + \vec{BC} = \vec{AO} + \vec{OC} = (1 + \alpha)\vec{AO}

\vec{BD} = \vec{BC} + \vec{CD} = \vec{BC} - \vec{AB} = \vec{BO} + \vec{OD} = (1 + \beta)\vec{OD}

Add the above

2\vec{BC} = 2\vec{AD} = (1 + \alpha)\vec{AO} + (1 + \beta)\vec{OD} = \vec{AO} + \vec{OD} + \alpha\vec{AO} + \beta\vec{OD} = \vec{AD} + \alpha\vec{AO} + \beta\vec{OD}

\vec{AD} = \alpha\vec{AO} + \beta\vec{OD} = \alpha(\vec{AD} - \vec{OD}) + \beta\vec{OD} = \alpha\vec{AD} + (\beta - \alpha)\vec{OD}

Since \vec{AD} and \vec{OD} are not parallel, the only possible combination of coefficients on the right hand side is \alpha = \beta = 1

\vec{OC} = \alpha\vec{AO} = \vec{AO}

\vec{BO} = \beta\vec{OD} = \vec{OD}
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top