Prove some relations but going round in circles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gregg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circles Relations
Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

I need to prove some relations but going round in circles.

## [\hat{J}_z, \hat{J}_+] = \hbar J_+ ##

I've got this:

##\left(a_+^{\dagger }a_+-a_-^{\dagger }a_-\right)\left(a_+^{\dagger }a_-\right)-\left(a_+^{\dagger }a_-\right)\left(a_+^{\dagger }a_+-a_-^{\dagger }a_-\right)##

Homework Equations



##J_{\pm} = \hbar a_{\pm}^{\dagger} a_{\mp} ##

##J_z = \frac{\hbar}{2} \left(a_+^{\dagger }a_+-a_-^{\dagger }a_-\right)##

The Attempt at a Solution

I have these sort of obvious relations to work from##[a_{\pm}^{\dagger}, a_{\pm}] = 1##
##[a_{\pm}^{\dagger}, a_{\mp}] = 0##
##[a_{\pm}^{\dagger}, a_{\mp}^{\dagger}] = 0##
##[a_{\pm}^{\dagger}, a_{\mp}] = 0##
##[a_{\pm}, a_{\mp}] = 0##

I start expanding and it gets too tough, what am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd suggest working in commutator notation instead of expanding it out completely. I.e. start from:
<br /> [\hat{J_z},\hat{J_+}] = [\frac{\hbar}{2} \left(a_+^{\dagger }a_+-a_-^{\dagger }a_-\right),\hbar a_{+}^{\dagger}a_{-}]<br />

Then manipulate that using the general rules of algebra for commutators.
 
Using

## [A+B,C] = [A,C] + [B,C] ##
## [AB,C] = [A,C]B + A[B,C] ##
## [A,BC] = [A,B]C + B[A,C] ##

It quickly boils down to

##\frac{\hbar^2}{2} \hat{a}_{+}^{\dagger} \hat{a}_{-} ##

I am out by a factor of half but I'm sure it works!
 
Yes it works fine, I factored a half out of the commutator wrongly. Thanks!
 
Sweet! I'm glad it worked out. These types of problems can and will get messy sometimes. Good thing I didn't have to puzzle through it myself. :P
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top