Prove that the period of a SHM is 2pi*sqrt(m/k)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ItsTheSebbe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Period Shm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the formula for the period of simple harmonic motion (SHM), expressed as T = 2π√(m/k), where m is mass and k is the spring constant. The user begins by setting up the equations of motion for a mass on a spring, leading to a second-order differential equation. They successfully derive the angular frequency ω as √(k/m) and express the position function x(t) in terms of cosine and sine functions. The final step involves using trigonometric identities to relate the coefficients of these functions to the desired form A cos(ωt + φ), allowing for the complete proof of the period formula. The discussion emphasizes the mathematical steps necessary to arrive at the conclusion, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationships between the variables involved.
ItsTheSebbe
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


When I was in high school I was thaught that the period of a simple harmonic oscillation (mass on spring, ball on pendulum, etc) was equal to ##T=2\pi \sqrt \frac m k## though they have never explained to me why. That's what I wanted to find out.

So for example, let's take a mass ##m## on a spring with spring constant ##k##, give it a little nudge and it will start oscillating in a wave-like manner (let's assume no energy is lost due to friction).

PS: This is the first time I'm trying to use LaTeX (first post in general), so if there's anything wrong with the formatting, please let me know :)!

Homework Equations


##T=\frac {2\pi} {\omega}##
##F_{spring}=-kx##
##F_{net}=ma##

The Attempt at a Solution


##F_{net}=F_{spring}##
##ma=-kx##
##m \frac {d^2x} {dt^2} +kx=0##
##\frac {d^2x} {dt^2} +\frac k m x=0##
##\ddot x(t) + \frac k m x(t)=0##

##\text{take} \ \ x=e^{Rt}##

##R^2e^{Rt} +\frac k m e^{Rt}=0##
##R^2+\frac k m =0##
##R^2=-\frac k m##
##R=\pm i\sqrt \frac k m ##

##\text{hence, } x(t)=C_1e^{i\sqrt \frac k m t}+C_2e^{-i\sqrt \frac k m t}##

Now, here I get stuck. I know I need to eventually get ##x(t)=Acos(\omega t+\phi)##
I don't really understand how to get there; probably by using Euler's formula.
From here on out I can proof the equation, namely:

##\ddot x=-A\omega^2\cos(\omega t+\phi)=-x\omega^2##
##\text{plugging into EoM gives:}##
##-x\omega^2+\frac k m x=0##
##\omega^2=\frac k m##
##\omega=\sqrt \frac k m##
##T=\frac {2\pi} {\omega}=2\pi \sqrt \frac m k##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ItsTheSebbe said:
##\text{hence, } x(t)=C_1e^{i\sqrt \frac k m t}+C_2e^{-i\sqrt \frac k m t}##

Now, here I get stuck. I know I need to eventually get ##x(t)=Acos(\omega t+\phi)##
I don't really understand how to get there; probably by using Euler's formula.
Your expression here can be re-written as:
$$x(t) = C_3 \cos(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} t) + C_4 \sin(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} t)$$
by suitably defining ##C_3## and ##C_4## in terms of ##C_1## and ##C_2## using Euler's formula, as you say.
 
Now how can I get from ##x(t) = C_3 \cos(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} t) + C_4 \sin(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} t)## to a form of ##x(t)=Acos(\omega t+\phi)##?
 
ItsTheSebbe said:
Now how can I get from ##x(t) = C_3 \cos(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} t) + C_4 \sin(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} t)## to a form of ##x(t)=Acos(\omega t+\phi)##?
You derived that ω = √(k/m). So you have to prove that C3cos(ωt)+C4sin(ωt)=Acos(ωt+Φ).

Expand the right side, using the addition formula for cosine. cos(α+β)=cos(α)cos(β)-sin(α)sin(β).
α=ωt and β=Φ.
So C3cos(ωt)+C4sin(ωt)=Acos(ωt)cos(Φ)-Asin(ωt)sin(Φ). The equality must hold for all values of ωt which means that the coefficient of both the cosine terms and the sine terms must be equal on both sides.
Or you can think that it must be true ωt=0 and also for ωt=pi/2:
For ωt=0, C3=Acos(Φ).
for ωt=pi/2, C4=-Asin(Φ).

You can find both A and Φ from these equations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top