Prove this is a right triangle in a sphere

AI Thread Summary
To prove that triangle APB is a right triangle within a sphere, one can utilize the inscribed angle theorem, which states that an angle inscribed in a circle is half of the central angle subtending the same arc. Given that AB is the diameter, the angle APB at point P must be a right angle since it subtends the semicircle formed by diameter AB. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the geometric properties of the triangle and the relationships between the angles. Additionally, vector methods can be employed to demonstrate orthogonality, reinforcing the conclusion that triangle APB is indeed a right triangle. Overall, the combination of geometric insights and vector analysis provides a solid foundation for the proof.
Sho Kano
Messages
372
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Let P be a point on the sphere with center O, the origin, diameter AB, and radius r. Prove the triangle APB is a right triangle

Homework Equations


|AB|^2 = |AP|^2 + |PB|^2
|AB}^2 = 4r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure if showing the above equations are true is the correct way to do this problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sho Kano said:

Homework Statement


Let P be a point on the sphere with center O, the origin, diameter AB, and radius r. Prove the triangle APB is a right triangle

Homework Equations


|AB|^2 = |AP|^2 + |PB|^2
|AB}^2 = 4r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure if showing the above equations are true is the correct way to do this problem

HInt: Try drawing a picture of triangle ABP with O at the center of AB. What do you know about OA, OB, and OP?
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
Sho Kano said:

Homework Statement


Let P be a point on the sphere with center O, the origin, diameter AB, and radius r. Prove the triangle APB is a right triangle

Homework Equations


|AB|^2 = |AP|^2 + |PB|^2
|AB}^2 = 4r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure if showing the above equations are true is the correct way to do this problem

The triangle ABP lies in a plane through the center of the sphere, so turns the three-dimensional problem into a 2-dimensional (planar) problem involving a circle of radius ##r##.
 
Untitled.png

Here's a very bad drawing (I forgot to insert the origin in, but let's just say it's there) (and let's say that the angle between BP and BA is x)

Is this sufficient?
|AB|^2 = |AP|^2 + |PB|^2
2r = d
|AP| = dsin(x)
|PB| = dcos(x)
|AB|^2 = d^2

d^2 = d^2 (cos(x)^2 + sin(x)^2)
d^2 = d^2
 
Last edited:
Sho Kano said:
View attachment 105538
Here's a very bad drawing (I forgot to insert the origin in, but let's just say it's there) (and let's say that the angle between BP and BA is x)

Is this sufficient?
|AB|^2 = |AP|^2 + |PB|^2

You can't start with the Pythagorean theorem because you don't know that is a right triangle. That is what you are supposed to prove.

2r = d
|AP| = dsin(x)
|PB| = dcos(x)
|AB|^2 = d^2

d^2 = d^2 (cos(x)^2 + sin(x)^2)
d^2 = d^2

You aren't trying to prove ##d^2 = d^2##.
 
LCKurtz said:
You can't start with the Pythagorean theorem because you don't know that is a right triangle. That is what you are supposed to prove.
You aren't trying to prove ##d^2 = d^2##.
But if it satisfies the pythagorean theorem then that must mean it's a right triangle right?
 
At the risk of repeating myself: You DON'T KNOW it satisfies the Pythagorean theorem because you don't know ##x## is a right angle.
 
What methods and/or tools have you been learning recently that would be applicable to this problem?

Are you allowed to use the inscribed angle theorem?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inscribed_angle

Or would using isosceles triangle rules be more appropriate?
 
RUber said:
What methods and/or tools have you been learning recently that would be applicable to this problem?

Are you allowed to use the inscribed angle theorem?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inscribed_angle

Or would using isosceles triangle rules be more appropriate?
I'm taking vector calculus and our teacher assigned this question for homework. I guess the methods we have been learning is the dot product and cross product and various vector properties.
 
  • #10
LCKurtz said:
At the risk of repeating myself: You DON'T KNOW it satisfies the Pythagorean theorem because you don't know ##x## is a right angle.
I don't know where to start. Could you give me a hint? I know that the magnitude of OP where P is any Point in the circle is r.
 
  • #11
Sho Kano said:
I don't know where to start. Could you give me a hint? I know that the magnitude of OP where P is any Point in the circle is r.
This problem doesn't require any calculus at all. You have a triangle with isosceles sub-triangles. Label the angles. Almost anything you write down about the various angles should lead you to the solution.
 
  • #12
LCKurtz said:
This problem doesn't require any calculus at all. You have a triangle with isosceles sub-triangles. Label the angles. Almost anything you write down about the various angles should lead you to the solution.
By sub-triangles, you mean the triangle inscribed within the bigger one? How do I know that those triangles are isosceles?
 
  • #13
Sho Kano said:
By sub-triangles, you mean the triangle inscribed within the bigger one? How do I know that those triangles are isosceles?

Here is what you wrote in post #10:

"I don't know where to start. Could you give me a hint? I know that the magnitude of OP where P is any Point in the circle is r."
 
  • #14
LCKurtz said:
Here is what you wrote in post #10:

"I don't know where to start. Could you give me a hint? I know that the magnitude of OP where P is any Point in the circle is r."
Don't see how that automatically makes a triangle inscribed within triangle APB an isosceles. I don't see it.
 
  • #15
Draw the picture I suggested in post #2, including the point O. The smaller triangles all have the point O as a vertex. Use the ideas you have been given. I can't do any more for you without working the problem for you.
 
  • #16
Look at it as two triangles, AOP and POB. Let one angle at O (say angle AOP) have measure z, then what is the measure of angle POB?
Notice that AO is a radius, and OP is a radius. This should give you a clue about what LCKurtz was talking about.
Remember that isosceles triangles have equal base angles and the sum of interior angles sum to 180.
This should be enough info for you to do the proof geometrically.

Using vectors, if you use the unit circle with diameter points at (-1,0) and (1,0) for simplicity, then for any point where ##\theta \neq 0, \pi##, your point P is at ## \cos \theta \hat x + \sin \theta \hat y ##. You can use the dot product of the vectors describing the legs to show that the vectors are orthogonal.
You could generalize to a non-unit circle by using diameter points at (-r,0) and (r,0) and point P at ## r\cos \theta \hat x + r\sin \theta \hat y ##.
 
  • #17
Think I got it, from the figure on post #4
PA\cdot PB=0\\ PA=OA-OP\\ PB=OB-OP\\ (OA-OP)\cdot (OB-OP)=0\\ OA\cdot OB-OA\cdot OP-OP\cdot OB+OP\cdot OP=0\\ OA=-OB,\quad OB\cdot OB={ r }^{ 2 },\quad OP\cdot OP={ r }^{ 2 }\\ -{ r }^{ 2 }-OA\cdot OP-OP\cdot OB+{ r }^{ 2 }=0\\ OP\cdot (-OA-OB)=0\\ OP\cdot (-OA-(-OA))=0\\ OP\cdot (O)=0
 
  • #18
Sho Kano said:
Think I got it, from the figure on post #4
PA\cdot PB=0\\ PA=OA-OP\\ PB=OB-OP\\ (OA-OP)\cdot (OB-OP)=0\\ OA\cdot OB-OA\cdot OP-OP\cdot OB+OP\cdot OP=0\\ OA=-OB,\quad OB\cdot OB={ r }^{ 2 },\quad OP\cdot OP={ r }^{ 2 }\\ -{ r }^{ 2 }-OA\cdot OP-OP\cdot OB+{ r }^{ 2 }=0\\ OP\cdot (-OA-OB)=0\\ OP\cdot (-OA-(-OA))=0\\ OP\cdot (O)=0
It looks like you are starting with what you want to prove. Other than that, I think your expansion and logic look good.
 
  • #19
Sho Kano said:
Think I got it, from the figure on post #4
If you do what LCKurtz (Post #15) suggested and draw the line OP, it cuts the triangle into two isosceles ones. The angle APB is β+γ. What is its value?
upload_2016-9-9_5-9-10.png
 
  • #20
ehild said:
If you do what LCKurtz (Post #15) suggested and draw the line OP, it cuts the triangle into two isosceles ones. The angle APB is β+γ. What is its value?
View attachment 105648
I see why they are isosceles now, then
2γ = α
2γ + 2β = 180
γ + β = 90
This way is much faster haha
 
  • #21
The fastest way I have found is to use the inscribed angle theorem. Not much to show there, though.
"The inscribed angle theorem states that an angle θ inscribed in a circle is half of the central angle 2θ that subtends the same arc on the circle."
A diameter is an example of a 180 degree central angle, so the inscribed angle at point P must be 1/2 of that.
 
Back
Top