Proving 0 = 6 with x^a=x^b=>a=b

  • Thread starter Thread starter vissh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the humorous proposition of proving that 0 equals 6 using the equation x^a = x^b implies a = b. Participants clarify that this relationship does not hold when x is 0 or 1, as both cases lead to contradictions. Specifically, for x = 0, any power results in zero, and for x = 1, the equation does not yield valid distinct values for a and b. The conversation emphasizes the need for restrictions on x to maintain the validity of the equation. Ultimately, the participants agree that common sense and formal proof can demonstrate these limitations.
vissh
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Helllo :D
One of my buddies asked me today to prove 0 = 6.
Then, my other buddy gave this as solution -
Bcoz we knw anything raised to the power 0 is one=>
bcoz
1=1
1^0=1^6
therefore 0=6(as x^a=x^b=>a=b)

Hehe funny . But as much as i remeber i too use x^a=x^b=>a=b . But now seeing this,I think that there must be some restriction on value of x.
What you think :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vissh said:
(as x^a=x^b=>a=b)
Err, no.

x^a = x^b \Rightarrow x = x^{b/a} \Rightarrow 1 = x^{b/a - 1}
 
Last edited:
Thanks for replying :)
Hootenanny said:
Err, no.

x^a = x^b \Rightarrow x = x^{b/a} \Rightarrow 1 = x^{b/a - 1},
hmm as u raised power 1/a both sides , a is not equal to 0.
Then,u divided by x => x is not equal to 0.
Hmmm i got only these restrictions and thus, x could be 1 and
thus , 1^2=1^6
therefore 2=6(as x^a=x^b=>a=b) [replaced 0 by 2 as i got a not equal 0 ]
hehe
So there are more restricitons i guess. can u pls put some light on them :)
Thanks in advance ^.^
 
vissh said:
Thanks for replying :)

hmm as u raised power 1/a both sides , a is not equal to 0.
Then,u divided by x => x is not equal to 0.

Hmmm i got only these restrictions and thus, x could be 1 and
thus , 1^2=1^6
therefore 2=6(as x^a=x^b=>a=b) [replaced 0 by 2 as i got a not equal 0 ]
hehe
So there are more restricitons i guess. can u pls put some light on them :)
Thanks in advance ^.^
So, for x=0 the relation doesn't hold. In a sense, this is obvious since 0 raised to any power is always zero. Therefore, x^a=x^b=>a=b doesn't hold for x=0. The other number which it doesn't hold for is x=1 :wink:.
 
So, its common sense that finally comes into play :)
 
vissh said:
So, its common sense that finally comes into play :)
Yes. Although, you could turn your example into a formal proof by contradiction that the relation x^a=x^b => a = b doesn't hold for x=0 or x=1.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top