Proving a Limit Involving Integrals and a Locally Integrable Function

MatthewD
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose f is continuous and F(x)=\int_a^x f(t)dt bounded on [a,b). Given g>0, g'\geq 0 and g' locally integrable on [a,b) and lim_{ x\rightarrow b^-} g(x) = infinity. prove
for p>1
\displaystyle{lim_{ x\rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{[g(x)]^p} \int^x_a f(t)g(t)dt = 0}

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


If you know lim_{ x\rightarrow b^-} g(x) =\infty, don't you also know lim_{ x\rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{[g(x)]} = 0 and therefore lim_{ x\rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{[g(x)]^p}=0...so we're done? But the hint says to use parts so I don't know :(
Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thats only the case if the integral is bounded, so you should try & show that...
 
How would I show an integral is bounded? If I know obviously \int_a^x f(t)dt is bounded, how would I know anything about the g function. The information given basically denies that its bounded right? Since the limit is infinity? I'm so lost!
 
have you tried the suggested hint?
 
also, bounded would show it, but I think a lesser constraiint may also work, either way I would try simplifying things by using integration by parts
 
When I tried parts, i let u= g(t) and dv = f(t)dt so du = g'(t)dt and v = F(t) and I got


\displaystyle{lim_{ x\rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{[g(x)]^p} \int^x_a f(t)g(t)dt = lim_{ x\rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{[g(x)]^p} (g(x)F(x) -g(a)F(a)- \int^x_a F(t)g'(t)dt)}

\displaystyle{= lim_{ x\rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{[g(x)]^p} (g(x)F(x) - \int^x_a F(t)g'(t)dt)}
since F(a) = 0

Can I reduce further...?
 
i see it now, using parts helped a lot, thanks

i'm suppose to follow it up with this addition:

assume further that \int^b_a f(t)dt converges and show lim_{x \rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{g(x)} \int_a^x f(t)g(t)dt = 0


i used parts again and came down to the fact:

lim_{x \rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{g(x)} \int_a^x f(t)g(t)dt = lim_{x \rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{g(x)} \int_a^x F(t)g'(t)dt


how do i show, for sure, this =0?
 
how about usng the fact that F is bounded, g'>0 and setting up an inequality which squeezes your expression to zero?
 
lanedance said:
how about usng the fact that F is bounded, g'>0 and setting up an inequality which squeezes your expression to zero?

The entire expression, or just the integral part? Could I do:

lim_{x\rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{g(x)} \leq lim_{x\rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{g(x)} \int^x_a F(t)g'(t)dt \leq lim_{x\rightarrow b^-} \int^x_a M g'(t)dt

where the right hand side becomes

=lim_{x\rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{g(x)}M(g(x)-g(a))
=lim_{x\rightarrow b^-} M(1-\frac{g(a)}{g(x)})

But how does this squeeze to 0? or am i looking at it wrong?
 
  • #10
the 2nd half of the equality is looking good, but i think you dropped a factor of p somewhere, maybe you could assume p = 1+\epsilon, \epsilon>0

you may need to tighten it up by accounting for the case when M<0, ie by starting from \exists M &gt; 0 : |F(x)|&lt;M,\forall x \in [a,b)
 
  • #11
but there's no p in the second part of the problem...?
 
  • #12
MatthewD said:
i'm suppose to follow it up with this addition:

assume further that \int^b_a f(t)dt converges and show lim_{x \rightarrow b^-} \frac{1}{g(x)} \int_a^x f(t)g(t)dt = 0

This is the second part...
 
  • #13
ok sorry, i missed the 2nd part, so you're ok with the first bit now?

so if i integrate by parts I get a little different:
\lim_{x \to b^-} \frac{1}{g(x)}\int_a^x dt f(t)g(t)
= \lim_{x \to b^-}\frac{1}{g(x)}(F(t)g(t)|_a^x - \int_a^x dt F(t)g&#039;(t))
= \lim_{x \to b^-}(F(x)-\frac{F(a)g(a)}{g(x)} - \frac{1}{g(x)}\int_a^x dt F(t)g&#039;(t))

using convergence of F as x->b, then
= F(b) - \lim_{x \to b^-}\frac{1}{g(x)}\int_a^x dt F(t)g&#039;(t)
so working this line, i guess you need to try & show the limit of the end expression is F(b)...
 
Last edited:
  • #14
i haven't totally worked it out, but it may help to try and show for any a<x0<b
\lim_{x \to b^-}\frac{1}{g(x)}\int_a^{x_0} dt F(t)g&#039;(t) = 0
noting that as g' is locally integrable, it means g is defined on the interval [a,b), ie. it doesn't explode anywhere

then try splitting the integral into separate portions & considering the continuity of the function f on a small region near to b. (though i could see this might get tricky with double limits...)
 
Back
Top