Proving a sequence is monotone.

  • Thread starter Thread starter peripatein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am unsuccessful at showing that the sequence √n + 1/n is an ascending monotone one, i.e. that a_n+1 > a_n for any n, greater than 2 let's say. I have proven that it is not bounded from above and is bounded from below. Any ideas, suggestions, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
peripatein said:
Hi,

I am unsuccessful at showing that the sequence √n + 1/n is an ascending monotone one, i.e. that a_n+1 > a_n for any n, greater than 2 let's say. I have proven that it is not bounded from above and is bounded from below. Any ideas, suggestions, please?
This appears to be essentially the same as a previous thread you started:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=649117
 
Hi,
Except that no one there was able to help me. Perhaps someone could now.
 
Consider your sequence as a function.
 
I am not allowed to. It has to be proven without any reference to functions. Seemingly merely by showing that a_n+1 > a_n for any n greater than 2. Yet I am unable to show that that inequality holds.
 
Write out what a_(n+1) actually is.
 
sqrt(n+1) + 1/(n+1).
 
Now what do you do to prove one sequence is larger than the other for all n≥2.
 
Induction? I have been unsuccessful at proving it via induction as well.
 
  • #10
If a_{n+1} > a_n \Rightarrow a_{n+1} - a_n > 0
 
  • #11
And?
 
  • #12
Write out what it means.
 
  • #13
sqrt(n+1) + 1/(n+1) - sqrt(n) - 1/n > 0
 
  • #14
peripatein said:
sqrt(n+1) + 1/(n+1) - sqrt(n) - 1/n > 0

You could clean it up a bit, but is that sequence greater than zero for every n?

If it helps, roughly around n = 1.2, your sequence geometrically will start to be above the line y=0.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
It surely is greater than zero but I am unable to demonstrate it algebrically, alas.
 
  • #16
peripatein said:
It surely is greater than zero but I am unable to demonstrate it algebrically, alas.

So, start with n≥2.

For n=2 does the inequality hold?
 
  • #17
It does.
 
Back
Top