Proving "AC=CA=0" for 2x2 Matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathmos6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Existence
Mathmos6
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Apologies, the title messed up - was meant to be 'existence of a C: AC=CA=0 for 2x2 matrices'.

Homework Statement



How would one show 'nicely' that for any 2x2 non-zero matrix A, there exists some 2x2 non-zero matrix C such that AC=CA=0? I can see how to show it by showing that the determinant is '0' for both A and C, so when you multiply out component-wise for AC=0, CA=0, you get 8 equations for the components of A/C and I can show that they can all be paired up as 'equivalent' equations (using ad=bc for both matrices) so in fact you have 4 equations in 4 unknowns - the 4 components of c - so they are solvable, so there does exist some appropriate 'c' - however that's clearly a horrible and slow way of proving the result, can anyone suggest a faster or neater method?

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are trying to prove something that isn't even true. Suppose A is the identity matrix? Or did you mean to specify that A is singular? In that case it has a zero eigenvector. Use that to construct C.
 
Dick said:
You are trying to prove something that isn't even true. Suppose A is the identity matrix? Or did you mean to specify that A is singular? In that case it has a zero eigenvector. Use that to construct C.

Sorry, there were 2 parts to the question phrased in a very unrelated way but obviously they were related, implying that yes, A is singular. Thanks very much for the help :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top