Proving Convergence of Series: (a_n) and (a_{2n-1} + a_{2n})

drawar
Messages
130
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let (a_n) be a sequence.
(i) Prove that if \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {{a_n}} converges, then \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\left( {{a_{2n - 1}} + {a_{2n}}} \right)} also converges.

(ii) Prove that if \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\left( {{a_{2n - 1}} + {a_{2n}}} \right)} converges and a_n \to 0, then \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {{a_n}} converges.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



(i) Let {R_n} = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {{a_k}}, {S_n} = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {{a_{2k - 1}}}, and {T_n} = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {{a_{2k}}}

Then {R_{2n}}={S_n}+{T_n}, since \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {{a_n}} converges, the sequence (R_n) converges, and so is the subsequence (R_{2n}). It follows that \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\left( {{a_{2n - 1}} + {a_{2n}}} \right)}.

(ii) Ok so I'm stuck on this part. I already have (R_{2n}) converges and (a_n) is bounded, how can I go about proving that (R_{n}) converges as well? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The convergence of Rn does not guarantee the convergence of Sn or Tn, you cannot write it as sum like that.
The idea to use a sequence and subsequences is good, however.

(ii) how can R2n+1 deviate from R2n, if an->0?
 
mfb said:
The convergence of Rn does not guarantee the convergence of Sn or Tn, you cannot write it as sum like that.
The idea to use a sequence and subsequences is good, however.

(ii) how can R2n+1 deviate from R2n, if an->0?

I'm sorry I wasn't able to reply earlier.

For (i), I agree with you that the convergence of R_n does not imply the convergence of S_n or T_n but it can imply that (S_n+S_n) converges right?

Btw, I think I may get your point for part (ii), let me just say what I'm thinking: Since R_{2n} = R_{2n-1}+a_{2n}, it can be deduced that R_{2n-1} converges to the same limit as R_{2n}, as a result, R_{n} converges.
 
drawar said:
For (i), I agree with you that the convergence of R_n does not imply the convergence of S_n or T_n but it can imply that (S_n+S_n) converges right?
If you replace the second S by a T (typo?), yes.

Btw, I think I may get your point for part (ii), let me just say what I'm thinking: Since R_{2n} = R_{2n-1}+a_{2n}, it can be deduced that R_{2n-1} converges to the same limit as R_{2n}, as a result, R_{n} converges.
That was the idea I had in mind, indeed.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top