Proving Disjoint Range & Null Space of Linear Operator T

guroten
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given a linear operator T, show that if rank(T^2)=rank(T), then the range and null space are disjoint.

So I know that I can form a the same basis for range(T^2) and range(T), but I'm not sure where to go from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
guroten said:

Homework Statement



Given a linear operator T, show that if rank(T^2)=rank(T), then the range and null space are disjoint.

So I know that I can form a the same basis for range(T^2) and range(T), but I'm not sure where to go from there.

I recommend you go back and reread the problem. The range and nullspace of any linear operator are subspaces- they both include the 0 vector and so are never disjoint. Perhaps the problem is to show that the only vector in both the range and null space is the 0 vector?

If so try a proof by contradiction. Let v be a non-zero vector in both range and null space of T. Since v is in the range of T there exist u such that v= Tu. Now, what is T2u?
 
You're right, I meant disjoint other than 0. I get that T2u=Tv=0, but what does that say about the rank?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top