Proving EM Waves Equations: E = Emsin(kx-ωt) and B = Bmsin(kx-ωt)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the electric field E = Emsin(kx-ωt) and magnetic field B = Bmsin(kx-ωt) satisfy the equations -∂B/∂x = μ₀ε₀∂E/∂t and ∂E/∂x = -∂B/∂t. Participants suggest substituting the expressions for E and B into the differential equations, taking derivatives, and relating μ₀ε₀ to k and ω. There is a mention of potential complications with B_m and E_m appearing on different sides of the equations. The conversation also references starting with Maxwell's equations as a foundational approach. Overall, the thread emphasizes the methodical approach to solving the equations through substitution and differentiation.
noppawit
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Show that the electric field: E = Emsin(kx-ωt) and magnetic field: B=Bmsin(kx-ωt) satisfy the following equations:

-\frac{\partial B}{\partial x} = \mu_{0}\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial E}{\partial t}

and

\frac{\partial E}{\partial x} = -\frac{\partial B}{\partial t}


I have no idea about this. Would you please guide me for solving this.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equations didn't come out properly so we can't help you.
 
Sorry for my bad Latex typing. :redface:

I've edited.
 
noppawit said:
Show that the electric field: E = Emsin(kx-ωt) and magnetic field: B=Bmsin(kx-ωt) satisfy the following equations:

-\frac{\partial B}{\partial x} = \mu_{0}\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial E}{\partial t}

and

\frac{\partial E}{\partial x} = -\frac{\partial B}{\partial t}


I have no idea about this. Would you please guide me for solving this.

Thanks.

In a situation like this, the usual procedure is to substitute the two given expressions into the differential equation, take the derivatives and see what happens. As I look at what you've been given (without working it out myself) I think you may have to figure out how to relate \mu_o \epsilon_o to k and \omega.
That should get you started. Let us know if you run into trouble.
 
AEM said:
In a situation like this, the usual procedure is to substitute the two given expressions into the differential equation, take the derivatives and see what happens. As I look at what you've been given (without working it out myself) I think you may have to figure out how to relate \mu_o \epsilon_o to k and \omega.
That should get you started. Let us know if you run into trouble.

Upon reading my previous post, I see a small problem with what I wrote. When you substitute the expressions for E an B into each equation, you'll end up with a B_m on one side and a E_m on the other. That's a nuisance. However, I'll bet you can figure out a way to combine those two equations into one equation and then do the substitution.
 
noppawit said:
Show that the electric field: E = Emsin(kx-ωt) and magnetic field: B=Bmsin(kx-ωt) satisfy the following equations:

-\frac{\partial B}{\partial x} = \mu_{0}\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial E}{\partial t}

and

\frac{\partial E}{\partial x} = -\frac{\partial B}{\partial t}


I have no idea about this. Would you please guide me for solving this.

Thanks.

IIRC, you would start with Maxwell's equations...
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top