Proving Hermitian Transformations: A Simple Approach

eridanus
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is the problem:

Let T be a complex linear space with a complex inner product <.,.>. Define T in L(V,V) to be Hermitian if <Tv,v> = <v,Tv> for all v in V.
Show that T is Hermitian iff <Tv,w> = <v,Tw> for all v,w in V [Hint: apply the definition to v+w and to v+iw].

So this was my thought process:
<T(v+w),v+w> = <v+w,T(v+w)>
<Tv+Tw,v+w> = <v+w,Tv+Tw>
<Tv,v> + <Tv,w> + <Tw,v> + <Tw,w> = <v,Tv> + <v,Tw> + <w,Tv> + <w,Tw>
And the terms with the same variables cancel out by definition so this leaves
<Tv,w> + <Tw,v> = <v,Tw> + <w,Tv>
which doesn't really help.

How do I go about doing this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Follow the entire hint.
 
AKG said:
Follow the entire hint.
I feel really dumb for asking this, but what? Simultaneously? I'm so confused
 
eridanus said:
I feel really dumb for asking this, but what? Simultaneously? I'm so confused

I think what he's getting at is to do the "v+iw" part and compare the two answers.

-Dan
 
Simply add the 2 results and then simplify by 2.

Daniel.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top