Proving Jacobian Product Equality: Does Constant Matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex Mamaev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product
Alex Mamaev
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Question:
The following are determinants of partial derivatives multiplied together giving another determinant of partial derivatives
Prove that this equality holds:

Relevant Equations:
|du/dx du/dy| |dx/dr dx/ds| |du/dr du/ds|
|dv/dx dv/dy| |dy/dr dy/ds| = |dv/dr dv/ds|

Attempt at Solution:
I took the determinant of first and second matrices, multiplied them together however the answer I got was twice the determinant that I expected. [ I expected to get: (du/dr)(dv/ds)-(du/ds)(dv/dr)]. Then when i tried to use the rule that the product of determinants is the determinant of products and took the determinant of the multiplied matrices i got four times the determinant that i expected.

Does this constant multiple matter or did I make a mistake. Pretty sure i got the algebra correct so is there an error in my reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to multiply the two matrices on the left, and think about the chain rule for partial derivatives.
 
Try to apply the composition formula for differentials, which says :
##f## differentiable in ##a## and ##g## differentiable in ##f(a)## ##\Rightarrow ## ##g\circ f## differentiable in ##a## and ##d_a(g\circ f) = d_{f(a)}(g) \circ d_a(f) ##

This translates in term of Jacobians by: ## J_{g\circ f}(a) = J_g(f(a)) \times J_f(a) ##
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top