Proving Logarithm Identity for Nonzero Complex Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigplanet401
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
bigplanet401
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that, for any two nonzero complex numbers z_1 and z_2,
<br /> \text{Log } (z_1 z_2) = \text{Log } z_1 + \text{Log } z_2 + 2 N \pi i \, ,<br />

where N has one of the values -1, 0, 1.


Homework Equations



The logarithm on the principal branch is:
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> &amp;\text{Log } z = \ln r + i \Theta \, ,\\<br /> \intertext{with}<br /> &amp;r &gt; 0 \text{ and } -\pi &lt; \Theta &lt; \pi \, .<br /> \end{align*}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried writing z_1 z_2 as exp(log(z_1) + log(z_2)) and taking the log that way, and I ended up getting the result above, but with N being allowed to take on any integer value. Note that
<br /> \log z = \ln |z| + i \arg z<br />

in general.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the equation you have for log under "attempt at a solution," because that's really the relevant equation. And don't express z1z2 as exp(log(z1) + log(z2)), express it in the form reiq.
 
The point with the N=1,0,-1 business is that when you add two numbers in (-pi,pi), you might not get a number in (-pi,pi), although you will get one in (-2pi,2pi). So, since adding an integer multiple of 2pi to the arg doesn't affect the result, you can either add or subtract 2pi and get back in the necessary (-pi,pi) range.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top