Proving Symmetry and Finding Conserved Quantities for Lagrangian Functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving symmetry in Lagrangian functions and finding conserved quantities. Specifically, it addresses the Lagrangian function L(q, dq/dt, t) under the infinitesimal translation q → q + ε. It establishes that if ∂L/∂q = 0, then L exhibits symmetry, and emphasizes the use of Taylor expansion to analyze this symmetry. The Euler-Lagrange equation is referenced as a crucial tool for identifying conserved quantities in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Familiarity with Taylor series and McLaurin expansion
  • Knowledge of infinitesimal calculus and perturbation theory
  • Basic concepts of conserved quantities in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the Euler-Lagrange equation in classical mechanics
  • Learn about Taylor series and McLaurin expansion in mathematical analysis
  • Explore the concept of symmetries in physics and Noether's theorem
  • Investigate examples of conserved quantities in various physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as educators and researchers interested in Lagrangian dynamics and conservation laws.

sunmaggot
Messages
62
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Given L (q, dq/dt, t).
translation: q ---> q + e (e is infinitesimal constant)
show that if ∂L/∂q = 0, then L is symmetry under the above translation.
then find conserved quantity.

Homework Equations


S = ∫ L dt

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is nothing... because I don't know the proper procedure to prove a symmetry. Do I simply prove L' - L = 0? But then the next part askes me to find conserved quantity. I have no idea how to find it...
So, can anyone spare me some hints...?[/B]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let ##L_1=L_1(q, \dot{q}, t)## and ##L_2## that with the replacement ##q\rightarrow q+ \epsilon##. Now consider the expansion of ##L_2## in the infinitesimal parameter ##\epsilon##.
 
CAF123 said:
Let ##L_1=L_1(q, \dot{q}, t)## and ##L_2## that with the replacement ##q\rightarrow q+ \epsilon##. Now consider the expansion of ##L_2## in the infinitesimal parameter ##\epsilon##.
do you mean taylor expansion??
 
sunmaggot said:
But then the next part askes me to find conserved quantity. I have no idea how to find it...

A conserved quantity means null time derivative of that quantity. Look at the Euler-Lagrange equation.
 
sunmaggot said:
do you mean taylor expansion??
Yup :)
 
CAF123 said:
Yup :)
cool, I will try it first!
 
CAF123 said:
Yup :)
the taylor series has a term (x-a), what should be the a?
 
sunmaggot said:
the taylor series has a term (x-a), what should be the a?

What should be the x?
 
ddd123 said:
What should be the x?
x is q?
 
  • #10
That's not what CAF123 suggested you to do. L is a function of phase space: you are interested in a small perturbation of the position variable, which changes the whole function L. So this means taking a McLaurin expansion in the infinitesimal translation parameter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
701
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K