Proving the expectation value of any eigenvalue function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the expectation value of a position operator for a particle in a box. The user initially finds the expectation value <x> to be 0 instead of L/2, leading to confusion about the integration process. The integration limits are clarified as from 0 to L, indicating the particle's confinement within a box of size L. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying limits in the integration to obtain the expected result. Proper understanding of the problem setup is crucial for accurate calculations.
Cocoleia
Messages
293
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


upload_2017-3-18_15-37-43.png


Homework Equations


upload_2017-3-18_15-38-16.png

upload_2017-3-18_15-40-42.png


The Attempt at a Solution


When I take the second formula, multiply by it's conjugate and then by x and do the integral of the first formula, I get 0, and not L/2, for <x>. Am I missing a formula ?
The complex conjugate of the exponential part multiplied by the exponential part simplifies to 1, and when I do the integral I end up with 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are your integration limits?
 
kuruman said:
What are your integration limits?
-infinity and +infinity, as in the first formula (the orange background)
 
What is the size of the "box" the particle is in?
 
kuruman said:
What is the size of the "box" the particle is in?
L? so would it be from 0 to L ?
 
Right. The particle is confined from 0 to L.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Finding the expected value of position in a Potential Well
Replies
31
Views
4K
Expectation value of momentum operator
Replies
14
Views
3K
Expectation Value and Probabilities of Spin Operator Sy
Replies
15
Views
6K
Expectation Value of Hamiltonian with Superposition
Replies
18
Views
6K
Expectation of Momentum in a Classical (Infinite) Potential Well
Replies
30
Views
4K
Most likely location of a particle versus expected value of
Replies
4
Views
4K
For what values of total energy is the resulting motion periodic?
Replies
25
Views
948
Expressing expectation values of a particle moving in a periodic potential
Replies
1
Views
2K
Quantum Mechanics: Expectation values (Griffiths)
Replies
7
Views
5K
Finding expectation values for given operators
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top