Pulley System on a Big Block: Solving for Acceleration with Zero Applied Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of mass M1 in a pulley system with zero applied force. The initial equations set up the relationships between the accelerations of the masses and the forces acting on them. A key point of contention arises from the interpretation of forces in the equations, particularly regarding the direction of acceleration and the net forces on M3. The final correct expression for the acceleration of M1 is provided, highlighting the importance of accurately accounting for all forces and their directions. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful analysis of free body diagrams and the relationships between the components of the system.
Buffu
Messages
849
Reaction score
146

Homework Statement



Find the accelaration of ##M_1## in the given system if ##F = 0##.
upload_2017-5-23_17-43-35.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2017-5-23_17-49-23.png


[/B]
##x_3 -x_1 = k \iff \ddot x_3 = \ddot x_1##

and ##h - y_3 + x_3 - x_2 = l \iff \ddot y_3 + \ddot x_2 = \ddot x_3 \qquad (*)##

h is the height of block ##M_1## and ## l ## is the length of string between ##M_2## and ##M_3##.

Now from the Free body diagram,

upload_2017-5-23_17-43-42.png


##-M\ddot x_1 = N^{\prime \prime \prime}##

##T = M_2 \ddot x_2##

##N^{\prime \prime \prime} = -M_3\ddot x_3##

##\therefore -M\ddot x_1 = M_2 \ddot x_2 - M_3\ddot x_3 \qquad (1)##

Now from vertical force on ##M_3##,

##M_3 - T = -M_3 \ddot y_3##

##-M_3 g + M_2 \ddot x_2 = M_3 \ddot y_3##

Substituting for ##\ddot y_3## in ##(*)##

##\ddot x_3 = x_2 + \dfrac{-M_3 g + M_2 \ddot x_2 }{M_3}##

Solving for ##\ddot x_2##

##x_2 = \dfrac {M_3(\ddot x_3 + g) }{M_3 + M_2}##

Substituting this in ##(1)##

##-M_1 \ddot x_1 = \dfrac {M_3M_2(\ddot x_3 + g) }{M_3 + M_2} - M_3\ddot x_3##

Since ##\ddot x_1 = \ddot x_3##

##-M_1 \ddot x_1 = \dfrac {M_3M_2(\ddot x_1 + g) }{M_3 + M_2} - M_3\ddot x_1##

Solving for ##\ddot x_1##

##\ddot x_1 = \dfrac{-g(M_2M_3)}{M_1M_2 + M_3M_1 - M_3^2}##

Which is incorrect as the given answer is ##\ddot x_1 = \dfrac{-g(M_2M_3)}{M_1M_2 + M_3M_1 \color{red}{ + 2M_2M_3 +} M_3^2}##.

What is the problem ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Buffu said:
Now from vertical force on ##M_3##, ##
M_3 - T = -M_3 \ddot y_3##
This equation doesn't look right.
 
kuruman said:
This equation doesn't look right.
Oh sorry that was a pure typo.
That equation should be,
##M_3g - T = -M\ddot y_3##.
 
Last edited:
Still not right. On the left side (Fnet) "down" is positive, but on the right side (mass x acceleration) "down" is negative.

Also, check equation (1). The center of mass does not accelerate because the only external force to the three mass system is a vertical force. So ##M_1 \ddot{x}_1+M_2 \ddot{x}_2+M_3 \ddot{x}_3=0##
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
kuruman said:
Still not right. On the left side (Fnet) "down" is positive, but on the right side (mass x acceleration) "down" is negative.

Also, check equation (1). The center of mass does not accelerate because the only external force to the three mass system is a vertical force. So ##M_1 \ddot{x}_1+M_2 \ddot{x}_2+M_3 \ddot{x}_3=0##

Yes I got the correct answer, but I think ##M_3g - T = -M\ddot y_3## is correct because ## y_3## is pointing upwards and so is ##\ddot y_3## and therefore I put a negative sign, since ##M_3g - T## is downwards as you said. Am I wrong ?
 
No, it's OK. I fooled myself because I didn't notice ##y_3## in the diagram.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top