Pulley with rotational consideration

  • Thread starter Thread starter endeavor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley Rotational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the linear speed of a descending mass from a pulley using conservation of mechanical energy. The user initially attempted to apply this principle but derived an incorrect formula for velocity. They later found the correct acceleration using a different method and confirmed the speed as 5.8 m/s. The challenge lies in equating the potential energy lost to the kinetic energy gained, including the rotational inertia of the pulley. Despite understanding the energy conservation concept, the user struggles to derive the correct linear speed using the energy approach.
endeavor
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
An object descends from a pulley.
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/9783/physics12qm.th.jpg
Use the conservation of mechanical energy to find the linear speed of the descending mass (m = 1.0kg) after it has descended a vertical distance of 2.0m from rest. (For the pulley, M = 0.30kg and R = 0.15m. Neglect friction and mass of the string)

I solved this question not using the conservation of mechanical energy. At first I tried using it though and I wound up getting:
vcm = square root of (4/3 mgh/M)

However, I determined the acceleration using a pervious example:
a = 2mg/(2m + M)
and then used v2 = 2ax
and got 5.8m/s which is the right answer...

but I don't know how to solve this question using the conservation of mechanical energy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let us take the body pulley Earth as our system. During the following event no external work is done on the system. So the mechanical energy of the system is conserved.
As the block slides an height h, then there is a loss of mgh amount of potential energy. Since there has been no loss of mechanical energy, the following potential energy is converted into Kinetic enegy. So you equate the change in potential energy to the change in Kinetic energy.
 
yes, i understand that part. is kinetic energy in this case equal to:
1/2 Icmw2 + 1/2 Mvcm2
and
I = 1/2MR2
so substituting v/R for w
mgh = 1/4 Mvcm2 + 1/2 Mvcm2

but solving for vcm here does not get me 5.8m/s
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top