PV diagrams for ideal gas: Finding Work Done

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by an ideal gas represented on a PV diagram, specifically from point A (300 kPa, 0.5 L) to point B (500 kPa, 1 L). The initial calculation of work as 100 J is questioned, as the textbook states it should be 200 J. Participants emphasize that the area under the graph must account for the true zero pressure, suggesting the use of trapezoidal area calculations. Clarifications are made regarding the correct geometric shape for the area calculation, confirming it should be a trapezoid. Accurate area calculation is essential to determine the correct work done by the gas.
slaw155
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Imagine a graph of pressure in kPa (y-axis) against volume in L (x-axis). There is a straight line moving from point A at 300kPa, 0.5L to point B at 500kPa, 1L. The false origin on this graph is 200kPa, 0L. What is the work done by the gas?


Homework Equations



W=pV

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that work is area under graph so its basically the area of a triangle plus area of trapezium. But this gives work = 100J but textbook says 200J. Where have I gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See the picture . You need the blue area from the really zero pressure.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • PVW.JPG
    PVW.JPG
    9.3 KB · Views: 555
slaw155 said:

Homework Statement


Imagine a graph of pressure in kPa (y-axis) against volume in L (x-axis). There is a straight line moving from point A at 300kPa, 0.5L to point B at 500kPa, 1L. The false origin on this graph is 200kPa, 0L. What is the work done by the gas?

Homework Equations



W=pV

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that work is area under graph so its basically the area of a triangle plus area of trapezium. But this gives work = 100J but textbook says 200J. Where have I gone wrong?
Use the formula for area of a trapezoid: (L1 + L2)/2 x W

AM
 
Last edited:
Andrew Mason said:
Use the formula for area of a parallelogram: (L1 + L2)/2 x W

AM

You meant trapezoid, I think :smile:

ehild
 
ehild said:
You meant trapezoid, I think :smile:

ehild
Right. A trapezoid.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top