Pycnometer Equation: Understanding Specific Gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter nobahar
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the derivation of the pycnometer equation for determining specific gravity, specifically the confusion regarding the term that accounts for the buoyancy of air. The equation presented indicates that the force exerted by the pycnometer on a balance is influenced by the mass of the bottle and the mass of the air displaced. The key point is that the second term in the equation corrects for the buoyancy effect of air, which must be considered for precise measurements. This correction is necessary because it accounts for the weight reduction experienced by the bottle due to the air pushing up against it. Additionally, there is a query about how air can exert upward pressure when an object is flat on a surface, highlighting the need for a better understanding of pressure dynamics in fluids. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of considering buoyancy in measurements involving specific gravity.
nobahar
Messages
482
Reaction score
2
hello!

On wiki, regarding specific gravity, it gives the derivation for the pycnometer equation for determining specific gravity. However, the first equation confuses me. It goes as follows:
The pycnometer, placed on a balance, will exert a force:
F = g(m_b - \frac{ \rho_a m_b}{ \rho_b})
The subscript b is for the bottle, and a is for air. rho is density and m is mass; g is the acceleration due to gravity
The force on the balance would be F = gm. The above equation suggests that the mass of the air displaced by the bottle needs to be subtracted from the mass of the bottle; so the mass used in the equation is the difference in mass between the bottle and the air that would occupy the space of the material used for the bottle. I don't understand why this is the case. Why does the mass of air that would occupy that space if the bottle wasn't there even matter? It seems irrelevant. Surely we need to consider the mass of the bottle, all of its mass.

Any help appreciated.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You have to go back to Archimedes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes tadchem
nobahar said:
hello!

On wiki, regarding specific gravity, it gives the derivation for the pycnometer equation for determining specific gravity. However, the first equation confuses me. It goes as follows:
The pycnometer, placed on a balance, will exert a force:
F = g(m_b - \frac{ \rho_a m_b}{ \rho_b})
The subscript b is for the bottle, and a is for air. rho is density and m is mass; g is the acceleration due to gravity
The force on the balance would be F = gm. The above equation suggests that the mass of the air displaced by the bottle needs to be subtracted from the mass of the bottle; so the mass used in the equation is the difference in mass between the bottle and the air that would occupy the space of the material used for the bottle. I don't understand why this is the case. Why does the mass of air that would occupy that space if the bottle wasn't there even matter? It seems irrelevant. Surely we need to consider the mass of the bottle, all of its mass.

Any help appreciated.

The second term:

- \frac{ \rho_a m_b}{ \rho_b}

is the correction to the weight of the bottle for the buoyancy of air. In the most precise work, this must be determined using air temperature, pressure, and humidity. This can amount to a correction of a few parts per million.
 
Thanks for the responses. I have a really dumb question: if something is flat on the surface, how can the air "push up" underneath the bottle? Dumb question, I know, but I am trying to visualise where the pressure comes from! Thanks for the responses so far!
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top