QM: Angular Momentum-Wavefunction "psi" & Schrodinger's Eq.

  • Thread starter Thread starter jsc314159
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm Shankar
jsc314159
Messages
18
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Particle described by wavefunction psi(r,theta,phi) = A*Exp[-r/a0] (a0 = constant)

(1) What is the angular momentum content of the state
(2) Assuming psi is an eigenstate in a potential that vanishes as r -> infinity, find E (match leading terms in Schrodinger's equation)
(3) Having found E, consider finite r and find V(r)

Homework Equations


Schrodinger's equation in spherical coordinates.

The Attempt at a Solution



(1) The term A, in the wavefunction, is not given to be a function of theta or phi. I am thinking it is a normalization constant. Therefore, apparently there is no theta or phi dependence, l = 0. Does this seem reasonable.

(2) If l = 0, then Schrodinger's equation becomes:

(-h_bar^2/(2*mu) *(1/r^2 * partial/partial_r * r^2 partial/partial_r) + V(r))psi = E*psi

Let V(r) = 0 and plug in the given psi.

The answer if get is E = -h_bar^2/(2*mu*ao^2*r^2) * (r^2 - 2*r*a0).
The book's answer is E = -h_bar^2/(2*mu*ao^2)

The additional terms in my solution come from carring out the differentiation operations on psi. The (1/r^2 * partial/partial_r * r^2 partial/partial_r) on psi gets me 1/r^2)* (r^2 - 2*r*a0). Somehow the book solution eliminates the 2*r*ao term but I do not see how.

If I can figure out where I am going off track on part 2, I think I can manage part 3. Can you help?

jsc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jsc314159 said:

Homework Statement



Particle described by wavefunction psi(r,theta,phi) = A*Exp[-r/a0] (a0 = constant)

(1) What is the angular momentum content of the state
(2) Assuming psi is an eigenstate in a potential that vanishes as r -> infinity, find E (match leading terms in Schrodinger's equation)
(3) Having found E, consider finite r and find V(r)

Homework Equations


Schrodinger's equation in spherical coordinates.


The Attempt at a Solution



(1) The term A, in the wavefunction, is not given to be a function of theta or phi. I am thinking it is a normalization constant. Therefore, apparently there is no theta or phi dependence, l = 0. Does this seem reasonable.

(2) If l = 0, then Schrodinger's equation becomes:

(-h_bar^2/(2*mu) *(1/r^2 * partial/partial_r * r^2 partial/partial_r) + V(r))psi = E*psi

Let V(r) = 0 and plug in the given psi.

The answer if get is E = -h_bar^2/(2*mu*ao^2*r^2) * (r^2 - 2*r*a0).
The book's answer is E = -h_bar^2/(2*mu*ao^2)

The additional terms in my solution come from carring out the differentiation operations on psi. The (1/r^2 * partial/partial_r * r^2 partial/partial_r) on psi gets me 1/r^2)* (r^2 - 2*r*a0). Somehow the book solution eliminates the 2*r*ao term but I do not see how.

If I can figure out where I am going off track on part 2, I think I can manage part 3. Can you help?

jsc

The potential is NOT zero. they just say that it goes to zero as r goes to infinity. So your solution is only valid when r goes to infinity. Take this limit in your answer and you will agree with the book.
 
kdv,

Thanks, that is the solution.

How can I learn to see these types of things more effectively?

jsc
 
jsc314159 said:
kdv,

Thanks, that is the solution.

How can I learn to see these types of things more effectively?

jsc

In this case, you simply had to read very carefully the question. That was the key: that they say thatV goes to zero at infinity.
 
I will keep that in mind.

Thanks again.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top