QM: Infinite Square Well -a/2 to a/2

chrisd
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have read similar threads about this problem but I wasn't able to make progress using them.

Homework Statement



Consider an infinite square-well potential of width a, but with the coordinate system shifted so that the infinite potential barriers lie at x=\frac{-a}{2} and x=\frac{a}{2}.

Solve the Schrodinger equation for this case to calculate the normalized wave function \psin(x) and the corresponding energies En

Homework Equations



Time Independent Schrodinger Equation (V(x)=0 within the well)
-\hbar2\frac{1}{2m} (\frac{∂}{∂x})2\psi=E\psi

The Attempt at a Solution



Skipping ahead to the general solution for \psi(x) , I get:

\psi(x) = Aeikx + Be-ikx, k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}

Using the boundary conditions,

\psi(\frac{a}{2})=Aeika/2 + Be-ika/2=0
\psi(\frac{-a}{2})=Ae-ika/2 + Beika/2=0,

together with some substitution I am able to prove that,

k =\frac{\pi}{a}n

En =(\frac{n\pi\hbar}{a})2\frac{1}{2m}

which I believe to be correct for infinite square well.

I run into trouble trying to solve for the constants A and B. My approach was to try and normalize the wavefunction and then use substitution to solve for A or B, but I can't seem to get anywhere after a certain point.
I would expect to get cosines for n=1,3,5... and sines for n=2,4,6... based on what I know about the shape of the wavefunction, but I am unsure how to prove this mathemetically.
Any tips would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try plugging in your allowed values of k into the boundary condition equations. You'll get a different relationship between A and B depending on whether n is odd or even.
 
Ah, that's the ticket. It's probably easier without using exponential form, but I was able to prove that A=B for odd n (giving me a cosine) and A=-B for even n (giving me a sine). Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top