QM: Prove Dirac Eigenstates of SHO are Orthonormal

  • Thread starter Thread starter hanks721
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
hanks721
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the eigenstates of the simple harmonic oscillator using Dirac notations are orthonormal.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
attempt? ...
 
Sorry malawi_glenn. I didn't post the attempt because I don't know how to write equations like everybody else does!
But I'll try to explain.
The first thing that came up to my mind is, to prove orthonormality I have to show,
<psi_m|psi_n>=0
and that is,

<psi_0|[(a^dagger)^m]/sqrt(m!)*[(a^dagger)^n]/sqrt(n!)|psi_0>=0

and then, I don't know how to evaluate further.

Once again, I'm sorry. I hope you don't get annoyed by my poor explanation.
Thanks
 
we can read it, do your best effort

now the dual correspondance to (a^dagger |psi>) is (<psi| a)

So, start over again.
 
also "show that"... is quite unprecise, since you construct states |n> according to (a^dagger)^n]/sqrt(n!)|psi_0> in order to make orthonormality.

What may be used? The canonical commutator relation only? Or what? Boring excerice I would say ;-)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top