QM- Tiny question on sigma & pi bonding states

Lisa...
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
Could somebody please explain the 2-fold degenerate sigma 2p is lower in energy than that of 4-fold degenerate the pi 2p bondings state in the O2 molecule? Does it have anything to do with resonance energies perhaps?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A simple way to think about this is to keep in mind that it is wavefunction overlap that causes a reduction or increase in orbital energy. To have a large change in energy (with respect to the parent atomic orbital) you must have large spatial overlap. Besides the extent of spatial overlap, there is the matter of whether the wavefunctions add or subtract, to form the corresponding molecular orbitals. In the first case, there is a decrease in energy, and in the second, an increase.

Now, we know that the \sigma _z orbitals form by overlap of the 2p_z orbitals in the internuclear direction. Clearly, the wavefunction overlap in this case is much greater than with the formation of \pi_x or \pi_y, where the overlap is only very small. Hence, the changes in energy of the \sigma _z orbitals with respect to the 2p energy will be much greater. As a result, the bonding \sigma _z has a lower energy than the bonding \pi_x or \pi_y, while the antibonding \sigma^* _z has a greater energy than the antibonding \pi^*_x or \pi^*_y.

The moral : more spatial overlap, more change in energy.

(In terms of stationary perturbation theory you can think of as resulting from larger off-diagonal terms in the hamiltonian)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top