B Quantisation of light and Doppler effect

AI Thread Summary
Light is quantized into photons, and the Doppler effect for light can be explained through the frame-dependent nature of photon frequency and energy. The frequency of a photon changes based on the relative motion of the source and observer, which does not violate conservation of energy, as energy is also frame-dependent. An analogy is made with kinetic energy, where an object's energy varies depending on the observer's frame of reference. The discussion emphasizes that while energy can change with motion, it remains conserved within the appropriate frame. Understanding the Doppler effect in light requires acknowledging these principles of relativity and energy conservation.
Vibin Narayanan
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Light consists of quanta(small packets of energy). Then how do we explain doppler effect of light the same way we do for sound? What is the valid explanation of light doppler effect which is consistent with the photon picture?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Vibin Narayanan said:
Light consists of quanta(small packets of energy). Then how do we explain doppler effect of light the same way we do for sound? What is the valid explanation of light doppler effect which is consistent with the photon picture?
The frequency of the photon (and hence its energy) is frame-dependent.
 
DrClaude said:
The frequency of the photon (and hence its energy) is frame-dependent.
That's it? I simply didn't get it. Energy changing with the motion of source or observer or both, doesn't violate conservation of energy?
 
Energy is conserved, but it is dependent on the frame. For example, I will measure a ball moving relative to me as having kinetic energy, but in a frame co-moving with the ball, it will have none.
 
Vibin Narayanan said:
That's it? I simply didn't get it. Energy changing with the motion of source or observer or both, doesn't violate conservation of energy?

Nope. Consider yourself in a car moving down the road. If another car comes up behind you 1 mph faster than you're going and taps your bumper, your car is not totaled, despite the fact that you both may be traveling 70+ mph.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top