Quantization/hydrogen atom problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter zl1corvette
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom
AI Thread Summary
To emit 656 nm light from the 3 -> 2 transition in hydrogen, incoming electrons must have sufficient kinetic energy to excite hydrogen atoms from their ground state (n=1) to the n=3 state. The required kinetic energy is equal to the energy difference between the n=1 and n=3 states. Once in the n=3 state, the electron can transition back to n=2, emitting light in the process. The discussion concludes with a confirmation that this approach works, and it raises a question about the electron's return to the n=2 state due to the nucleus's attraction. Understanding these energy transitions is crucial for solving the quantization problem in hydrogen atoms.
zl1corvette
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a homework problem that goes like this.
A beam of electrons is incident upon a gas of hydrogen atoms. What minimum speed must the electrons have to cause the emission of 656 nm light from the 3 -> 2 transition of hydrogen?
So I had a couple of thoughts
1) It was the velocity needed to have state 3 orbit, but that's not right.
2) It was the velocity needed to have n=2 orbit, but that's not right either.
3) It was the velocity such that an electron had KE equal to the difference in E of states 3 and 2 but that's not it either.
I suppose the wavelength of the light has something to do with this but it's just the wavelength of hydrogen emission 3->2 so I don't know what that tells you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In order to produce transitions from n=3 to n=2 , you have to get the atoms into the n=3 state to begin with. Atoms are normally in their ground state (n=1).
 
So if the incoming electrons had KE greater than the ionization energy it could remove an electron from the n=1 orbit and the atom completely. So a KE equal to the difference of the n=1 E and n=3 E would move it to the n=3 orbit? Then the orbiting electron simply falls back to the n=2 level?
*goes to try it*

edit:
It works!
Danke sehr
Does it just go back to n=2 because it's attacted to the nucleus or?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top