Quantum Effects Negligible in Diffraction, Tunneling & Zero-Point Oscillation

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I am to show that quantum effects are negligible in:

(i) The diffraction of a tennis ball of mass m=0.1 kg moving at a speed of 0.5 m/s
by a window of size 1X1.5 m^2

(ii)The tunneling probability for a marble of mass m=5 g moving at a speed of 10 cm/s against a rigid obstacle of height H=5 cm and width w=1 cm

(iii)The amplitude of the zero point oscillation for a pendulum of length l=1m and mass 1 kg

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I show the first by: finding the de Broglie wavelength and arguing that for diffraction effects to be observable, we must have the incident ray's wavelength to be comparable in magnitude of the slit width length.

I show the third by: the QM amplitude is given by

\Delta\ x=\sqrt [{h}{/2m\omega}]

where h is actually h bar.(LaTeX did not accept \hbar)

Clearly the ampitude tends to zero for classical model given...

I am not sure of the correct expression of zero point amplitude in QM harmonic Oscillator but I get it in

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hosc4.html#c1

Please let me know if it is correct...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
due to some technical problem,there has been some problem with this thread...And another thread of the same name is appearing.I do not know why it is,but ifg it is my fault,I am expressing regret to Administrator
 
I show the first by: finding the de Broglie wavelength and arguing that for diffraction effects to be observable, we must have the incident ray's wavelength to be comparable in magnitude of the slit width length.

I show the third by: the QM amplitude is given by

\Delta\ x=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}

where h is actually h bar.(LaTeX did not accept \hbar)

Clearly the ampitude tends to zero for classical model given...

I am not sure of the correct expression of zero point amplitude in QM harmonic Oscillator but I get it in

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hosc4.html#c1

Please let me know if it is correct...


I found a formula of Transmission coeff here

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/barr.html

T~exp[-2kL] where k~\sqrt{U-E}/h

Then the exponential is so small that the probability tends to zero.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top