Quantum logic gate measurement?

nfelddav
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Do quantum logic gates perform measurements? (collapse the wavefunction)

For example:

If I apply a cNOT gate to a pair of cubits with wavefunction 1/\sqrt{2} |10> + 1/\sqrt{2} |00>
what would I expect as the result?

1/\sqrt{2} |11> + 1/\sqrt{2} |00>
?

or

1|11>
or
1|00>

or
are the states not entangled? This seems unlikely because it would be cloning...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nfelddav said:
Do quantum logic gates perform measurements? (collapse the wavefunction)

For example:

If I apply a cNOT gate to a pair of cubits with wavefunction 1/\sqrt{2} |10> + 1/\sqrt{2} |00>
what would I expect as the result?

1/\sqrt{2} |11> + 1/\sqrt{2} |00>
?

or

1|11>
or
1|00>

or
are the states not entangled? This seems unlikely because it would be cloning...

A logic gate is unitary, a measurement (when described as including the collapse) is not unitary. So, the result of the cnot is 1/\sqrt{2} |11> + 1/\sqrt{2} |00>. And yes, this is an entangled state.
 
Thank you,
That's what seemed the most reasonable, but I wasn't sure.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top