Quantum Mechanics expectation value problem

rockstar101
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electron is in the spin state in the Sz representation

|ψ> = A (1-2i 2)T <- this is a 2 X 1 matrix

If Sx is measured, what values and probabilities do you get?
What is the expectation value of Sx?


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



So first, I need to find what A equals to:

A^2 [ (1-2i)(1+2i)+ 4 ] = 1
thus A = 1/3

now, I need to know what values of Sx I would get and the probabilities to
proceed to find the expectation value.

What values of Sx would I get? could it be just +/- h-bar/2 ??
What would be the probabilities??

I would really appreciate any hint or help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rockstar101 said:

Homework Statement



An electron is in the spin state in the Sz representation

|ψ> = A (1-2i 2)T <- this is a 2 X 1 matrix


I assume you mean

|\psi\rangle=A\begin{pmatrix}1-2i&amp;2\end{pmatrix}^T=A\begin{pmatrix}1-2i\\2\end{pmatrix}

?

now, I need to know what values of Sx I would get and the probabilities to
proceed to find the expectation value.

What values of Sx would I get? could it be just +/- h-bar/2 ??
What would be the probabilities??

I would really appreciate any hint or help!

What is the matrix representation of S_x in the z-basis? What are its eigenvalues and eigenvectors?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top