Quantum mechanics HW problem on infinite square well.

quellcrist
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1.
##<x>= \int_{0}^{a}x\left | \psi \right |^{2}dx##
##\psi (x)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}##
then ##<x>= \frac{2}{a} \int_{0}^{a}x \sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}dx##


2. Homework Equations

1) ##y=\frac{n\pi x}{a}## then ##dy=\frac{n\pi}{a}dx##
and
2)
##y=\frac{n\pi x}{a}## then ##dx=\frac{a}{n\pi}dy##

then
##\psi (x)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \sin(y)##
##<x>= \frac{2}{a}\int_{0}^{a=n\pi}y \sin^{2}ydy \times \frac{a}{n\pi} \times \frac{a}{n\pi}##


3. The Attempt at a Solution

I don't need help solving the general problem for the expectation value of x...I have the solution manual. The question I have is about how/why they chose to solve the integral this way by substituting y for (n*pi*x)/(a)? I understand how 1) works but I need help clarifying how 2) works.

I need a general walkthrough of why they are doing this integral this way.

Thank you

<Moderator's note: formatting tidied up. OP, please make sure your posts are readable and use the proper LaTeX tags>
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi quell,
It is pretty customary to work around integrands with ##\sin ax## to get integrands with ##\sin y## : it makes it easier to get this factor a outside the integral, especially when higher powers occur and/or partial integrations are involved.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top